## What this PR does
Some HelmReleases use `chartRef` instead of `chart`. If the lineage
webhook finds such a HelmRelease, a nil pointer dereference happens.
This patch adds a nil check to guard against this.
### Release note
```release-note
[lineage] Add a nil check to guard against HelmReleases with a nil
.spec.chart field when traversing the ownership tree.
```
Some HelmReleases use `chartRef` instead of `chart`. If the
lineage webhook finds such a HelmRelease, a nil pointer dereference
happens. This patch adds a nil check to guard against this.
```release-note
[lineage] Add a nil check to guard against HelmReleases with a nil
.spec.chart field when traversing the ownership tree.
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
Fix an incorrect JSON path that prevented Service LoadBalancer IPs from
rendering in the table view.
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
The lineage-controller-webhook makes a lot of outgoing API calls for
every event it handles, contributing to a high API server latency,
increasing the number of in-flight requests and generally degrading
performance. This patch remedies this by separating the lineage
component from the cozystack-controller and deploying it as a separate
component on all control-plane nodes. Additionally, a new internal label
is introduced to track if a resource has already been handled by the
webhook. This label is used to exclude such resources from
consideration. Addresses #1513.
```release-note
[lineage] Break webhook out into a separate daemonset. Reduce
unnecessary webhook calls by marking handled resources and excluding
them from consideration by the webhook's object selector.
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Start the PR title with the [label] of Cozystack component:
- For system components: [platform], [system], [linstor], [cilium],
[kube-ovn], [dashboard], [cluster-api], etc.
- For managed apps: [apps], [tenant], [kubernetes], [postgres],
[virtual-machine] etc.
- For development and maintenance: [tests], [ci], [docs], [maintenance].
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be backported
to a previous version.
-->
## What this PR does
### Release note
<!-- Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same [label] as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->
```release-note
[]
```
Since the Cozystack extension API can now change dynamically while there
are live clients (the lineage webhook) querying this API, the REST
mapper of the client should "expect" that things may change and refresh
their discovery information when they get a cache miss to see if new
kinds have been registered.
```release-note
[lineage] Use an auto-refreshing RESTMapper in the webhook's API client
that tries to update its API discovery info when it fails to GET a
resource kind that was previously not registered in its schema.
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
This patch extends the resource-selecting function of the webhook to
also apply selectors to ingresses and services, like has been already
done for secrets. The Cozystack resource definitions have been upgraded
to contain two more fields: `ingresses` and `services` and populated
with counterparts of the legacy selectors from the dashboard roles.
```release-note
[controller, api] Enable marking ingresses and services as user-facing
and implement selectors for existing CozystackResourceDefinitions.
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
This patch carries the selectors for secrets to be shown to end users
over from the legacy dashboard-resourcemap roles into the new
CozystackResourceDefinition selectors. Also a {{ .namespace }} template
variable is added to the variables supported in the `resourceNames`
field in the selector.
```release-note
[controller,api] Support {{ .namespace }} in `resourceNames` resource
selectors, add whitelist of secrets to show to end-users.
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
This patch refactors the secret selectors to use the
`internal.cozystack.io/tenantresource` label for managing secret
visibility and removes any selectors based on it or the previous
`apps.cozystack.io/tenantresource` label, the idea being that this label
will only ever be set by the controller.
```
[controller,api] Refactor labels for the secret selector.
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
This patch implements name-based selectors for
`CozystackResourceDefinitions.spec.secrets`. Application developers may
now specify secrets that should or should not be visible to end users by
specifying a `resourceNames` field with a string slice of acceptable
names. This will, for instance, let developers exclude a secret like
`postgres-dbname-superuser` that has a predictable name even if it does
not have predictable labels. Simple templates are supported, so
`postgres-{{ .name }}-superuser` is also a valid entry under
`resourceNames`.
```release-note
[lineage, controller] Let application developers determine resource
visibility for end users by name, as well as by labels.
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
- Refactor code for dashboard resources creation
- Move dashboard-config helm chart to dynamic dashboard controller
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Start the PR title with the [label] of Cozystack component:
- For system components: [platform], [system], [linstor], [cilium],
[kube-ovn], [dashboard], [cluster-api], etc.
- For managed apps: [apps], [tenant], [kubernetes], [postgres],
[virtual-machine] etc.
- For development and maintenance: [tests], [ci], [docs], [maintenance].
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be backported
to a previous version.
-->
## What this PR does
### Release note
<!-- Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same [label] as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->
```release-note
[]
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* Static dashboard resources (breadcrumbs, factories, forms, marketplace
panels, table mappings) are initialized at startup and materialized
automatically.
* **Improvements**
* Unified UI construction with consistent badges, headers and
deterministic IDs.
* Automatic cleanup of stale/orphaned dashboard resources.
* Increased controller client throughput for faster operations.
* **Refactor**
* Consolidated static dashboard resource generation into a unified,
config-driven flow.
* **Chores**
* Removed legacy dashboard-config templates; updated controller and
dashboard image digests.
* Added dashboard ConfigMap and wired UI env vars to it.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
A new dashboard based on https://github.com/PRO-Robotech/openapi-ui
project
<img width="1720" height="1373" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 09-01-00
OpenAPI UI"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7ae04789-24ec-4e4b-830b-6f16e96513eb"
/>
<img width="1720" height="1373" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 09-01-14
OpenAPI UI"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ca5aa85d-43f0-4b5b-b87a-3bc237834f10"
/>
<img width="1720" height="1373" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-01 at 09-02-05
OpenAPI UI"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ebee7bfa-c3ac-4fe6-b5e1-43e9e7042c6a"
/>
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Start the PR title with the [label] of Cozystack component:
- For system components: [platform], [system], [linstor], [cilium],
[kube-ovn], [dashboard], [cluster-api], etc.
- For managed apps: [apps], [tenant], [kubernetes], [postgres],
[virtual-machine] etc.
- For development and maintenance: [tests], [ci], [docs], [maintenance].
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be backported
to a previous version.
-->
<!-- Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same [label] as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->
```release-note
[cozystack-api] Implement TenantNamespace, TenantModules, TenantSecret and TenantSecretsTable resources
[cozystack-controller] Introduce new dashboard-controller
[dashboard] Introduce new dashboard based on openapi-ui
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
[cozystack-controller] Introduce new dashboard-controller
[dashboard] Introduce new dashboard based on openapi-ui
Co-authored-by: kklinch0 <kklinch0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: kklinch0 <kklinch0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
Many resources created as part of managed apps in cozystack (pods,
secrets, etc) do not carry predictable labels that unambiguously
indicate which app originally triggered their creation. Some resources
are managed by controllers and other custom resources and this
indirection can lead to loss of information. Other controllers sometimes
simply do not allow setting labels on controlled resources and the
latter do not inherit labels from the owner. This patch implements a
webhook that sidesteps this problem with a universal solution. On
creation of a pod/secret/PVC etc it walks through the owner references
until a HelmRelease is found that can be matched with a managed app
dynamically registered in the Cozystack API server. The pod is mutated
with labels identifying the managed app.
```release-note
[cozystack-controller] Add a mutating webhook to identify the Cozystack
managed app that ultimately owns low-level resources created in the
cluster and label these resources with a reference to said app.
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
## What this PR does
Many resources created as part of managed apps in cozystack (pods,
secrets, etc) do not carry predictable labels that unambiguously
indicate which app originally triggered their creation. Some resources
are managed by controllers and other custom resources and this
indirection can lead to loss of information. Other controllers sometimes
simply do not allow setting labels on controlled resources and the
latter do not inherit labels from the owner. This patch implements a
webhook that sidesteps this problem with a universal solution. On
creation of a pod/secret/PVC etc it walks through the owner references
until a HelmRelease is found that can be matched with a managed app
dynamically registered in the Cozystack API server. The pod is mutated
with labels identifying the managed app.
### Release note
```release-note
[cozystack-controller] Add a mutating webhook to identify the Cozystack
managed app that ultimately owns low-level resources created in the
cluster and label these resources with a reference to said app.
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Adds an admission webhook that injects application lineage labels on
resource create/update for improved observability and ownership tracing.
- Adds a runtime-updatable mapping for resolving HelmRelease →
application, and registers both the lineage controller and webhook
during startup.
- Adds Deployment, Service, and cert-manager templates to enable and
secure the webhook (in-cluster TLS, service routing).
- **Tests**
- Adds a test to exercise lineage traversal and validate ownership-graph
resolution and labeling.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
Many resources created as part of managed apps in cozystack (pods,
secrets, etc) do not carry predictable labels that unambiguously
indicate which app originally triggered their creation. Some resources
are managed by controllers and other custom resources and this
indirection can lead to loss of information. Other controllers sometimes
simply do not allow setting labels on controlled resources and the
latter do not inherit labels from the owner. This patch implements a
webhook that sidesteps this problem with a universal solution. On
creation of a pod/secret/PVC etc it walks through the owner references
until a HelmRelease is found that can be matched with a managed app
dynamically registered in the Cozystack API server. The pod is mutated
with labels identifying the managed app.
```release-note
[cozystack-controller] Add a mutating webhook to identify the Cozystack
managed app that ultimately owns low-level resources created in the
cluster and label these resources with a reference to said app.
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
This patch implements external monitoring of the Kube-OVN cluster. A new
reconciler timed to run its reconcile loop at a fixed interval execs
into the ovn-central pods and collects their cluster info. If the
members' opinions about the cluster disagree, an alert is raised. Other
issues with the distributed consensus are also highlighted.
```release-note
[kubeovn,cozystack-controller] Implement the KubeOVN plunger, an
external monitoring agent for the ovn-central cluster.
```
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
Workloads tracking an object undergoing deletion can be reconciled when
the object is marked for deletion, but is not yet removed. After the
object is deleted, there is no event to trigger another reconciliation
of the workload and it might never get deleted until a global reconcile
happens or the controller is restarted. This patch ensures they are
requeued in the reconciliation loop.
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Start the PR title with the [label] of Cozystack component:
- For system components: [platform], [system], [linstor], [cilium],
[kube-ovn], [dashboard], [cluster-api], etc.
- For managed apps: [apps], [tenant], [kubernetes], [postgres],
[virtual-machine] etc.
- For development and maintenance: [tests], [ci], [docs], [maintenance].
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be backported
to a previous version.
-->
## What this PR does
### Release note
<!-- Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same [label] as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->
```release-note
[platform] Fix stale workloads not being deleted
```
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Improvements**
* Added a delay before reprocessing items that are being deleted,
resulting in more efficient handling of deletions.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Workloads tracking an object undergoing deletion can be reconciled when
the object is marked for deletion, but is not yet removed. After the
object is deleted, there is no event to trigger another reconciliation
of the workload and it might never get deleted until a global reconcile
happens or the controller is restarted. This patch ensures they are
requeued in the reconciliation loop.
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
When the WorkloadMonitor is reconciled and child Workload objects are
created, they will now get additional labels in the
`workloads.cozystack.io` namespace, containing metadata about the
workload. This particular commit checks if a pod targeted by a Workload
is owned by a VirtualMachineInstance (i.e. it launches a KubeVirt VMI)
and, if so, gets the VMI instance type and puts it in the
`kubevirt-vmi-instance-type` label.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Workload objects created for Pods now include additional labels
extracted from their owner references, specifically for
VirtualMachineInstance resources.
- If a VirtualMachineInstance has a relevant annotation, its instance
type is now reflected as a label on the associated Workload.
- **Chores**
- Updated and added several dependencies to improve compatibility and
maintainability.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
When the WorkloadMonitor is reconciled and child Workload objects are
created, they will now get additional labels in the
`workloads.cozystack.io` namespace, containing metadata about the
workload. This particular commit checks if a pod targeted by a Workload
is owned by a VirtualMachineInstance (i.e. it launches a KubeVirt VMI)
and, if so, gets the VMI instance type and puts it in the
`kubevirt-vmi-instance-type` label.
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new controller to synchronize tenant HelmReleases and
propagate configuration changes.
- Added dynamic host value overrides in multiple Helm templates by
conditionally retrieving values from the "tenant-root" HelmRelease.
- Updated RBAC permissions to allow management of HelmRelease resources.
- **Improvements**
- Added support for Helm v2 API integration.
- Enhanced HelmRelease reconciliation logic and configuration
propagation for tenant environments.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Fixed periodic reconciliation for the "tenant-root" HelmRelease by
setting its interval to zero.
- **Version Updates**
- Incremented version numbers for the "info" and "ingress" packages.
- **Chores**
- Updated version mappings and commit references.
- Improved .gitignore to exclude the .vscode directory.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
* Count Workload resources for pods by requests, not limits
* Do not count init container requests
* Prefix Workloads for pods with `pod-`, just like the other types to
prevent possible name collisions (closes#787)
The previous version of the WorkloadMonitor controller incorrectly
summed resource limits on pods, rather than requests. This prevented it
from tracking the resource allocation for pods, which only had requests
specified, which is particularly the case for kubevirt's virtual machine
pods. Additionally, it counted the limits for all containers, including
init containers, which are short-lived and do not contribute much to the
total resource usage.
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
When populating the WorkloadMonitor objects, the status field is now
populated with a specially formatted string, mimicking the keys of
ResourceQuota.spec.hard, e.g.
`<storageclassname>.storageclass.storage.k8s.io/requests.storage` or
`<ipaddresspoolname>.ipaddresspool.metallb.io/requests.ipaddresses`
so the storage class or IP pool in use can be tracked. Part of #788.
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
Workload object counts were previously getting out of control as the recreation of a related Pod would spawn a new workload, while the old one would never get deleted (except for StatefulSets, where the names of Pods are stable). Workloads without a matching object are now deleted.
