Commit Graph

122 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Thomas Eizinger
cd650de1f8 refactor: prepare client init for upstream DoH servers (#10851)
In order to support multiple different protocols of upstream DNS
resolvers, we deprecate the `upstream_dns` field in the client's `init`
message and introduce two new fields:

- `upstream_do53`
- `upstream_doh`

For now, only `upstream_do53` is populated and `upstream_doh` is always
empty.

On the client-side, we for now only introduce the `upstream_do53` field
but fall-back to `upstream_dns` if that one is empty. This makes this PR
backwards-compatible with the portal version that is currently deployed
in production. Thus, this PR can be merged even prior to deploying the
portal.

Internally, we prepare connlib's abstractions to deal with different
kinds of upstreams by renaming all existing "upstream DNS" references to
`upstream_do53`: DNS over port 53. That includes UDP as well as TCP DNS
resolution.

Resolves: #10791

---------

Co-authored-by: Jamil Bou Kheir <jamilbk@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-11-12 05:40:58 +00:00
Thomas Eizinger
b8b52c1f07 fix(portal): do not allow ports for upstream DNS servers (#10772)
DNS servers are standarised to be contacted on port 53. This is also
hard-coded within `connlib` when we contact an upstream server. As such,
we should disallow users inputting any custom port for upstream DNS
servers. Luckily - or perhaps because it doesn't presently work - no
users in production have actually put in a port.

Resolves: #8330
2025-11-04 04:44:57 +00:00
Thomas Eizinger
3e9ef4772b feat(gateway): extend flow logs with more client properties (#10717)
In order to make the flow logs emitted by the Gateway more useful and
self-contained, we extend the `authorize_flow` message sent to the
Gateway with some more context around the Client and Actor of that flow.
In particular, we now also send the following to the Gateway:

- `client_version`
- `device_os_version`
- `device_os_name`
- `device_serial`
- `device_uuid`
- `device_identifier_for_vendor`
- `device_firebase_installation_id`
- `identity_id`
- `identity_name`
- `actor_id`
- `actor_email`

We only extend the `authorize_flow` message with these additional
properties. The legacy messages for 1.3.x Clients remain as is. For
those Clients, the above properties will be empty in the flow logs.

Resolves: #10690

---------

Signed-off-by: Thomas Eizinger <thomas@eizinger.io>
Co-authored-by: Jamil <jamilbk@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-10-30 02:13:22 +00:00
Brian Manifold
27565ea5c8 refactor(portal): remove soft delete elements from portal code (#10607)
Why:

* In previous commits, the portal code had been updated to use hard
deletion rather than soft deletion of data. The fields used in the soft
deletion were still kept in the DB and the code to allow for zero
downtime rollout and an easy rollback if necessary. To continue with
that work the portal code has now been updated to remove any reference
to the soft deleted fields (e.g. deleted_at, persistent_id, etc...).
While the code has been updated the actual data in the DB will need to
remain for now, to once again allow for a zero downtime rollout. Once
this commit has been deployed to production another PR can follow to
remove the columns from the necessary tables in the DB.


Related: #8187
2025-10-18 17:02:26 +00:00
Jamil
b61fd20de8 chore(portal): remove Jason in favor of JSON (#10550)
Since Elixir 1.18, json encoding and decoding support is included in the
standard library. This is built on OTP's native json support which is
often faster than other implementations.

It mostly has the same API as the popular Jason library, differing
mainly in the format of the error responses returned when decoding
fails.

To minimize dependence on external libraries, we remove the Jason lib in
favor of this external dependency.

Fixes #8011
2025-10-13 17:39:53 +00:00
Jamil
2e0517ed7b feat(api): GET /account API (#10302)
By customer request, it would be helpful to expose an endpoint to
retrieve current account / billing details like seats used and other
usage-based metrics.

---------

Signed-off-by: Jamil <jamilbk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-09-28 11:59:39 -07:00
Brian Manifold
6bd19ee9b0 refactor(portal): hard delete data (#9694) 2025-08-29 22:13:44 +00:00
Jamil
6d2ea0b224 fix(portal): adapt resource on resource_updated (#10247)
When filters are updated for a Resource, we need to first adapt the
resource before rendering it down to the Gateway. Otherwise, the gateway
may see a Resource that does not match its expected schema.
2025-08-23 17:53:20 +00:00
Jamil
cafe6554ff refactor(portal): reduce cache memory usage (#10058)
Napkin math shows that we can save substantial memory (~3x or more) on
the API nodes as connected clients/gateways grow if we just store the
fields we need in order to keep the client and gateway state maintained
in the channel pids.

To facilitate this, we create new `Cacheable` structs that represent
their `Domain` cousins, which use byte arrays for `id`s and strip out
unused fields.

Additionally, all business logic involved with maintaining these caches
is now contained within two modules: `Domain.Cache.Client` and
`Domain.Cache.Gateway`, and type specs have been added to aid in static
analysis and code documentation.

Comprehensive testing is now added not only for the cache modules, but
for their associated channel modules as well to ensure we handle
different kinds of edge cases gracefully.

The `Events` nomenclature was renamed to `Changes` to better name what
we are doing: Change-Data-Capture.

Lastly, the following related changes are included in this PR since they
were "in the way" so to speak of getting this done:

- We save the last received LSN in each channel and drop the `change`
with a warning if we receive it twice in a row, or we receive it out of
order
- The client/gateway version compatibility calculations have been moved
to `Domain.Resources` and `Domain.Gateways` and have been simplified to
make them easier to understand and maintain going forward.


Related: #10174 
Fixes: #9392 
Fixes: #9965
Fixes: #9501 
Fixes: #10227

---------

Signed-off-by: Jamil <jamilbk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-08-22 21:52:29 +00:00
Brian Manifold
551ceafb13 fix(portal): REST api updates (#10191)
* Minor updates to the REST API to more gracefully handle incorrect
input data from requests.
* Minor updates to the OpenAPI spec.
2025-08-20 21:08:07 +00:00
Jamil
54d91e2004 fix(portal): don't send reject_access for remaining flows (#10071)
This fixes a simple logic bug where we were mistakenly reacting to a
flow deletion event where flows still existed in the cache by sending
`reject_access`. This fixes that bug, and adds more comprehensive
logging to help diagnose issues like this more quickly in the future.

This PR also fixes the following issues found during the investigation:

- We were redundantly reacting to Token deletion in the channel pids.
This is unnecessary: we send a global socket disconnect from the Token
hook module instead.
- We had a bug that would crash the WAL consumer if a "global" token
(i.e. relay) was deleted or expired - these have no `account_id`.
- We now always use `min(max(all_conforming_polices_expiration),
token.expires_at)` when setting expiration on a new flow to minimize the
possibility for access churn.
- We now check to ensure the token and gateway are still undeleted when
re-authorizing a given flow. This prevents us from failing to send
`reject_access` when a token or gateway is deleted corresponding to a
flow, but the other entities would have granted access.


Related: https://firezone.statuspage.io/incidents/xrsm13tml3dh
Related: #10068 
Related: #9501
2025-08-01 00:03:00 +00:00
Jamil
ccc736e63e fix(portal): reauthorize new flow when last flow deleted (#9974)
The `flows` table tracks authorizations we've made for a resource and
persists them, so that we can determine which authorizations are still
valid across deploys or hiccups in the control plane connections.

Before, when the "in-use" authorization for a resource was deleted, we
would have flapped the resource in the client, and sent `reject_access`
to the gateway. However, that would cause issues in the following edge
case:

- Client is currently connected to Resource A through Policy B
- Client websocket goes down
- Policy B is created for Resource A (for another actor group), and
Policy A is deleted by admin
- Client reconnects
- Client sees that its resource list is the same
- Gateway has since received `reject_access` because no new flows were
created for this client-resource combination

To prevent this from happening, we now try to "reauthorize" the flow
whenever the last cached flow is removed for a particular
client-resource pair. This avoids needing to toggle the resource on the
client since we won't have sent `reject_access` to the gateway.
2025-07-25 01:53:10 +00:00
Jamil
488cb96469 fix(portal): don't prematurely reject access (#9952)
Before:

- When a flow was deleted, we flapped the resource on the client, and
sent `reject_access` naively for the flow's `{client_id, resource_id}`
pair on the gateway. This resulted in lots of unneeded resource flappage
on the client whenever bulk flow deletions happened.

After:

- When a flow is deleted, we check if this is an active flow for the
client. If so, we flap the resource then in order to trigger generation
of a new flow. If access was truly affected, that results in a loss of a
resource, we will push `resource_deleted` for the update that triggered
the flow deletion (for example the resource/policy removal). On the
gateway, we only send `reject_access` if it was the last flow granting
access for a particular `client/resource` tuple.


Why:

- While the access state is still correct in the previous
implementation, we run the possibility of pushing way too many resource
flaps to the client in an overly eager attempt to remove access the
client may not have access to.

cc @thomaseizinger 

Related:
https://firezonehq.slack.com/archives/C08FPHECLUF/p1753101115735179
2025-07-21 13:12:05 -07:00
Jamil
f379e85e9b refactor(portal): cache access state in channel pids (#9773)
When changes occur in the Firezone DB that trigger side effects, we need
some mechanism to broadcast and handle these.

Before, the system we used was:

- Each process subscribes to a myriad of topics related to data it wants
to receive. In some cases it would subscribe to new topics based on
received events from existing topics (I.e. flows in the gateway
channel), and sometimes in a loop. It would then need to be sure to
_unsubscribe_ from these topics
- Handle the side effect in the `after_commit` hook of the Ecto function
call after it completes
- Broadcast only a simply (thin) event message with a DB id
- In the receiver, use the id(s) to re-evaluate, or lookup one or many
records associated with the change
- After the lookup completes, `push` the relevant message(s) to the
LiveView, `client` pid, or `gateway` pid in their respective channel
processes

This system had a number of drawbacks ranging from scalability issues to
undesirable access bugs:

1. The `after_commit` callback, on each App node, is not globally
ordered. Since we broadcast a thin event schema and read from the DB to
hydrate each event, this meant we had a `read after write` problem in
our event architecture, leading to the potential for lost updates. Case
in point: if a policy is updated from `resource_id-1` to
`resource_id-2`, and then back to `resource_id-1`, it's possible that,
given the right amount of delay, the gateway channel will receive two
`reject_access` events for `resource_id-1`, as opposed to one for
`resource_id-1` and one for `resource_id-2`, leading to the potential
for unauthorized access.
1. It was very difficult to ensure that the correct topics were being
subscribed to and unsubscribed from, and the correct number of times,
leading to maintenance issues for other engineers.
1. We had a nasty N+1 query problem whenever memberships were added or
removed that resolved in essentially all access related to that
membership (so all Policies touching its actor group) to be
re-evaluated, and broadcasted. This meant that any bulk addition or
deletion of memberships would generate so many queries that they'd
timeout or consume the entire connection pool.
1. We had no durability for side-effect processing. In some places, we
were iterating over many returned records to send broadcasts.
Broadcasting is not a zero-time operation, each call takes a small
amount of CPU time to copy the message into the receiver's mailbox. If
we deployed while this was happening, the state update would be lost
forever. If this was a `reject_access` for a Gateway, the Gateway would
never remove access for that particular flow.
1. On each flow authorization, we needed to hit `us-east1` not only to
"authorize" the flow, but to log it as well. This incurs latency
especially for users in other parts of the world, which happens on
_each_ connection setup to a new resource.
1. Since we read and re-authorize access due to the thin events
broadcasted from side effects, we risk hitting thundering herd problems
(see the N+1 query problem above) where a single DB change could result
in all receivers hitting the DB at once to "hydrate" their
processing.ion
1. If an administrator modifies the DB directly, or, if we need to run a
DB migration that involves side effects, they'll be lost, because the
side effect triggers happened in `after_commit` hooks that are only
available when querying the DB through Ecto. Manually deleting (or
resurrecting) a policy, for example, would not have updated any
connected clients or gateways with the new state.


To fix all of the above, we move to the system introduced in this PR:

- All changes are now serialized (for free) by Postgres and broadcasted
as a single event stream
- The number of topics has been reduced to just one, the `account_id` of
an account. All receivers subscribe to this one topic for the lifetime
of their pid and then only filter the events they want to act upon,
ignoring all other messages
- The events themselves have been turned into "fat" structs based on the
schemas they present. By making them properly typed, we can apply things
like the existing Policy authorizer functions to them as if we had just
fetched them from the DB.
- All flow creation now happens in memory and doesn't not need to incur
a DB hit in `us-east1` to proceed.
- Since clients and gateways now track state in a push-based manner from
the DB, this means very few actual DB queries are needed to maintain
state in the channel procs, and it also means we can be smarter about
when to send `resource_deleted` and `resource_created_or_updated`
appropriately, since we can always diff between what the client _had_
access to, and what they _now_ have access to.
- All DB operations, whether they happen from the application code, a
`psql` prompt, or even via Google SQL Studio in the GCP console, will
trigger the _same_ side effects.
- We now use a replication consumer based off Postgres logical decoding
of the write-ahead log using a _durable slot_. This means that Postgres
will retain _all events_ until they are acknowledged, giving us the
ability to ensure at-least-once processing semantics for our system.
Today, the ACK is simply, "did we broadcast this event successfully".
But in the future, we can assert that replies are received before we
acknowledge the event as processed back to Postgres.



The tests in this PR have been updated to pass given the refactor.
However, since we are tracking more state now in the channel procs, it
would be a good idea to add more tests for those edge cases. That is
saved as a later PR because (1) this one is already huge, and (2) we
need to get this out to staging to smoke test everything anyhow.

Fixes: #9908 
Fixes: #9909 
Fixes: #9910
Fixes: #9900 
Related: #9501
2025-07-18 22:47:18 +00:00
Jamil
17d7e29b81 fix(portal): use public key for TURN creds (#9870)
As a followup to #9856, after talking with @bmanifold, we determined
using the public_key as the username for TURN credentials is a safer bet
because:

- It's by definition public and therefore does not need to be obfuscated
- It's shorter-lived than the token, especially for the gateway
- It essentially represents the data plane connection for client/gateway
and naturally rotates along with the key state for those
2025-07-15 01:48:02 +00:00
Jamil
1e577d31b9 fix(portal): use reproducible relay creds (#9857)
When giving TURN credentials to clients and gateways, it's important
that they remain consistent across hiccups in the portal connection so
that relayed connections are not interrupted during a deploy, or if the
user's internet is flaky, or the GCP load balancer decides to disconnect
the client/gateway.

Prior to this PR, that was not the case because we essentially tied TURN
credentials, required for data plane packet flows, to the WebSocket
connection, a control plane element. This happened because we generated
random `expires_at` and `salt` elements on _each_ connection to the
portal.

Instead, what we do now is make these reproducible and tied to the auth
token by hashing then base64-encoding it. The expiry is tied to the
auth-token's expiry.


Fixes #9856
2025-07-14 17:42:11 +00:00
Jamil
e98aa82e8e fix(portal): respect gateway_group_id filter in REST API (#9840)
Fixes #9815
2025-07-11 19:12:05 +00:00
Jamil
dddd1b57fc refactor(portal): remove flow_activities (#9693)
This has been dead code for a long time. The feature this was meant to
support, #8353, will require a different domain model, views, and user
flows.

Related: #8353
2025-06-27 20:40:25 +00:00
Jamil
0b09d9f2f5 refactor(portal): don't rely on flows.expires_at (#9692)
The `expires_at` column on the `flows` table was never used outside of
the context in which the flow was created in the Client Channel. This
ephemeral state, which is created in the `Domain.Flows.authorize_flow/4`
function, is never read from the DB in any meaningful capacity, so it
can be safely removed.

The `expire_flows_for` family of functions now simply reads the needed
fields from the flows table in order to broadcast `{:expire_flow,
flow_id, client_id, resource_id}` directly to the subscribed entities.

This PR is step 1 in removing the reliance on `Flows` to manage
ephemeral access state. In a subsequent PR we will actually change the
structure of what state is kept in the channel PIDs such that reliance
on this Flows table will no longer be necessary.

Additionally, in a few places, we were referencing a Flows.Show view
that was never available in production, so this dead code has been
removed.

Lastly, the `flows` table subscription and associated hook processing
has been completely removed as it is no longer needed. We've implemented
in #9667 logic to remove publications from removed table subscriptions,
so we can expect to get a couple ingest warnings when we deploy this as
the `Hooks.Flows` processor no longer exists, and the WAL data may have
lingering flows records in the queue. These can be safely ignored.
2025-06-27 18:29:12 +00:00
Jamil
343717b502 refactor(portal): broadcast client struct when updated (#9664)
When a client is updated, we may need to re-initialize it if "breaking"
fields are updated. If non-breaking fields are changed, such as name, we
don't need to re-initialize the client.

This PR also adds a helper `struct_from_params/2` which will create a
schema struct from WAL data in order to type cast any needed data for
convenience. This avoid having to do a DB hit - we _already have the
data from the DB_ - we just need to format and send it.

Related: #9501
2025-06-25 17:04:41 +00:00
Jamil
933d51e3d0 feat(portal): send account_slug in gateway init (#9653)
Adds the `account_slug` to the gateway's `init` message. When the
account slug is changed, the gateway's socket is disconnected using the
same mechanism as gateway deletion, which causes the gateway to
reconnect immediately and receive a new `init`.

Related: #9545
2025-06-24 18:35:06 +00:00
Jamil
c6545fe853 refactor(portal): consolidate pubsub functions (#9529)
We issue broadcasts and subscribes in many places throughout the portal.
To help keep the cognitive overhead low, this PR consolidates all PubSub
functionality to the `Domain.PubSub` module.

This allows for:

- better maintainability
- see all of the topics we use at a glance
- consolidate repeated functionality (saved for a future PR)
- use the module hierarchy to define function names, which feels more
intuitive when reading and sets a convention

We also introduce a `Domain.Events.Hooks` behavior to ensure all hooks
comply with this simple contract, and we also introduce a convention to
standardize on topic names using the module hierarchy defined herein.

Lastly, we add convenience functions to the Presence modules to save a
bit of duplication and chance for errors.

This will make it much easier to maintain PubSub going forward.


Related: #9501
2025-06-15 04:30:57 +00:00
Jamil
cbe33cd108 refactor(portal): move policy events to WAL (#9521)
Moves all of the policy lifecycle events to be broadcasted from the WAL
consumer.

#### Test

- [x] Enable policy
- [x] Disable policy
- [x] Delete policy
- [x] Non-breaking change
- [x] Breaking change


Related: #6294

---------

Signed-off-by: Jamil <jamilbk@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-14 01:10:09 +00:00
Jamil
c31f51d138 refactor(portal): move resource events to WAL (#9406)
We move the resource events to the WAL system. Notably, we no longer
need `fetch_and_update_breakable` for resource updates, so a bit of
refactoring is included to update the call sites for those.

Additionally, we need to add a `Flow.expire_flows_for_resource_id/1`
function to expire flows from the WAL system. This is now being called
in the WAL event handler. To prevent this from blocking the WAL
consumer/broadcaster, we wrap it with a Task.async. These will be
cleaned up when the lookup table for access is implemented next.

Another thing to note is that we lose the `subject` when moving from
`Flows.expire_flows_for(%Resource{}, subject)` to
`Flows.expire_flows_for_resource_id(resource_id)` when a resource is
deleted or updated by an actor since we respond to this event in the WAL
where that data isn't available. However, we don't actually _use_ the
subject when expiring flows (other than authorize the initial resource
update), so this isn't an issue.

Related: #9501

---------

Signed-off-by: Jamil <jamilbk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brian Manifold <bmanifold@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-11 00:12:45 +00:00
Jamil
38c1de351c refactor(portal): move membership events to WAL (#9388)
Membership events are quite simple to move to the WAL:

- Only one topic is used to determine which client(s) receive updates
for which Actor(s).
- The unsubscribe was removed because it was unused.
- Notably, the N+1 query problem regarding re-evaluating all access
again after each membership is updated is still present. This will be
fixed using a lookup table in the client channel in the last PR to move
events to the WAL.

Related: https://github.com/firezone/firezone/issues/6294
Related: https://github.com/firezone/firezone/issues/8187
2025-06-06 06:23:33 +00:00
Jamil
9c3f6e7b36 refactor(portal): don't send ip_stack for non-DNS resources (#9376)
We always return the `ip_stack` field when rendering resource for both
WebSocket and REST APIs. If the resource's type is not `:dns` then this
will be `nil`.

Related:
https://github.com/firezone/firezone/pull/9303#discussion_r2119681062
2025-06-02 23:16:49 -07:00
Jamil
6fc7d2e4e0 feat(portal): configurable ip stack for DNS resources (#9303)
Some poorly-behaved applications (e.g. mongo) will fail to connect if
they see both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses for a DNS resource, because they
will try to connect to both of them and fail the whole connection setup
if either one is not routable.

To fix this, we need to introduce a knob to allow admins to restrict DNS
resources to only A or AAAA records.


<img width="750" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-02 at 10 48 39 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4dbcb6ae-685f-43ee-b9e8-1502b365a294"
/>

<img width="1174" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-02 at 11 05 53 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/02d0a4b3-e6e8-4b6d-89fa-d3d999b5811e"
/>

---

Related:
https://firezonehq.slack.com/archives/C08KPQKJZKM/p1746720923535349
Related: #9300
Fixes: #9042
2025-06-03 02:24:41 +00:00
Jamil
73c3e2d87b refactor(portal): move gateway events to WAL (#9299)
This PR moves Gateway events to be triggered by the WAL broadcaster.
Some things of note that are cleaned up:

- The gateway `:update` event was never received anywhere (but in a
test) and so has been removed
- The account topic has been removed as it was also never acted upon
anywhere. Presence yes, but topic no
- The group topic has also been removed as it was only used to receive
broadcasted disconnects when a group is deleted, but this was already
handled by the token deletion and so is redundant.
2025-06-01 16:40:28 +00:00
Brian Manifold
a51b35a6b4 refactor(portal): remove created_by_<identity/actor> columns (#9306)
Why:

* Now that we have started using the `created_by_subject` field on
various tables, we no longer need to keep the
`created_by_<identity/actor>` fields. This will help remove a foreign
key reference and will be one step closer to allowing us to hard delete
data rather than soft deleting all data in order to keep foreign key
references like these.
2025-05-30 21:06:35 +00:00
Jamil
6cea0cd6ec refactor(portal): Move client updates to WAL broadcaster (#9288)
Client updates are next on the path to moving more side effects to the
WAL broadcaster. This one has the following notable changes:

- ~~The `actor_clients` pubsub topic were only used to broadcast removal
of clients belonging to an actor; these are no longer needed since we
handle this in the individual removal event~~ EDIT: only the presence is
kept
- The `account_clients:{account_id}` pubsub and presence topic
definition has been moved to `Events.Hooks.Accounts` because these are
broadcasted using the account_id field based on account changes, and
have nothing to do with the client lifecycle


Related: #6294 
Related: #8187
2025-05-29 16:56:08 +00:00
Jamil
7c674ea21c refactor(portal): Move expire_flow to WAL broadcaster (#9286)
Similar to #9285, we move the `expire_flow` event to be broadcasted from
the WAL broadcaster.

Unrelated tests needed to be updated to not expect to receive the
broadcast, and instead check to ensure the record has been updated.

A minor bug is also fixed in the ordering of the `old_data, data`
fields.

Tested manually on dev.

Related: #6294 
Related: #8187
2025-05-29 06:35:03 +00:00
Brian Manifold
12b4a12f26 feat(portal): Add created_by_subject (#9176)
Why:

* We have decided to change the way we will do audit logging. Instead of
soft deleting data and keeping it in the table it was created in, we
will be moving to an audit trail table where various actions will be
recorded in a table/DB specifically for auditing purposes. Due to this
change we need to make sure that we don't have stale/dangling
references. One set of references we keep everywhere is
`created_by_identity_id` and `created_by_actor_id`. Those foreign key
references won't be able to be used after moving to the new audit
system. This commit will allow us to keep that info by pulling the
values and storing the data in a created_by_subject field on the record.
2025-05-20 20:03:46 +00:00
Brian Manifold
dd5a53f686 fix(portal): Fix sign_up to properly populate email (#9105)
Why:

* During the account sign up flow, the email of the first admin was not
being populated in the `email` column on the auth_identities table. This
was due to atoms being passed in the attrs instead of strings to the
`create_identity` function. A migration was also created to backfill the
missing emails in the `auth_identities` table.
2025-05-13 19:49:25 +00:00
Jamil
43d084f97f refactor(portal): Enforce internet resource site exclusion (#8448)
Finishes up the Internet Resource migration by enforcing:

- No internet resources in non-internet sites
- No regular resources in internet sites
- Removing the prompt to migrate

~~I've already migrated the existing internet resources in customer's
accounts. No one that was using the internet resource hadn't already
migrated.~~

Edit: I started to head down that path, then decided doing this here in
a data migration was going to be a better approach.

Fixes #8212
2025-03-15 18:25:32 -05:00
Brian Manifold
d133ee84b7 feat(portal): Add API rate limiting (#8417) 2025-03-13 03:21:09 +00:00
Jamil
6d527c1308 feat(portal): Search domain UI and JSON view (#8401)
- Adds a simple text input to configure search domains ("default DNS
suffix") in the Settings -> DNS page.
- Sends the `search_domain` field as part of the client's `init` message
- Fixes a minor UI alignment inconsistency for the upstream resolvers
field so that the total form width and `New resolver` button width are
the same.


<img width="1137" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-09 at 10 56 56 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a1d5a570-8eae-4aa9-8a1c-6aaeb9f4c33a"
/>



Fixes #8365
2025-03-10 17:46:40 +00:00
Jamil
c3a9bac465 feat(portal): Add client endpoints to REST API (#8355)
Adds the following endpoints:

- `PUT /clients/:id` for updating the `name`
- `PUT /clients/:client_id/verify` for verifying a client
- `PUT /clients/:client_id/unverify` for unverifying a client
- `GET /clients` for listing clients in an account
- `GET /clients/:id` for getting a single client
- `DELETE /clients/:id` for deleting a client

Related: #8081
2025-03-05 00:37:01 +00:00
Jamil
e064cf5821 fix(portal): Debounce relays_presence (#8302)
If the websocket connection between a relay and the portal experiences a
temporary network split, the portal will immediately send the
disconnected id of the relay to any connected clients and gateways, and
all relayed connections (and current allocations) will be immediately
revoked by connlib.

This tight coupling is needlessly disruptive. As we've seen in staging
and production logs, relay disconnects can happen randomly, and in the
vast majority of cases immediately reconnect. Currently we see about 1-2
dozen of these **per day**.

To better account for this, we introduce a debounce mechanism in the
portal for `relays_presence` disconnects that works as follows:

- When a relay disconnects, record its `stamp_secret` (this is somewhat
tricky as we don't get this at the time of disconnect - we need to cache
it by relay_id beforehand)
- If the same `relay_id` reconnects again with the same `stamp_secret`
within `relays_presence_debounce_timeout` -> no-op
- If the same `relay_id` reconnects again with a **different**
`stamp_secret` -> disconnect immediately
- If it doesn't reconnect, **then** send the `relays_presence` with the
disconnected_id after the `relays_presence_debounce_timeout`

There are several ways connlib detects a relay is down:

1. Binding requests time out. These happen every 25s, so on average we
don't know a Relay is down for 12.5s + backoff timer.
2. `relays_presence` - this is currently the fastest way to detect
relays are down. With this change, the caveat is we will now detect this
with a delay of `relays_presence_debounce_timer`.

Fixes #8301
2025-03-04 23:56:40 +00:00
Jamil
fee808bc62 chore(portal): Log error for unknown channel messages (#8299)
Instead of crashing, it would make sense to log these and let the
connected entity maintain its WebSocket connection.

This should never happen in practice if we maintain our version
compatibility matrix properly, but it will help reduce the blast radius
of a channel message bug that happens to slip out into the wild.

Fixes #4679
2025-03-03 21:21:39 +00:00
Jamil
cb0bf44815 chore: Remove ability to create GCP log sinks (#8298)
This has long since been removed in the Clients.
2025-02-28 20:57:21 +00:00
Jamil
e03047d549 feat(portal): Send gateway ipv4 and ipv6 to client (#8291)
In order to properly handle SRV and TXT records on the clients, we need
to be able to pick a Gateway using the initial query itself. After that,
we need to know the Gateway Tunnel IPs we're connecting to so we can
have the query perform the lookup.

Fixes #8281
2025-02-28 03:52:27 +00:00
Brian Manifold
bc150156ce fix(portal): Update gateway channel to process resource_update (#8280)
Why:

* After merging #8267 it was discovered that there was a race condition
that allowed a `resource_create` message to end up at the Gateway
Channel process. Previously, this message would not have ever arrived,
because we were replacing Resource IDs when a breaking change was made,
but since that is no longer the case, it is possible that a connection
could be established between the time the `delete_resource` and
`create_resource` messages are sent and the `create_resource` would end
up at the Gateway Channel process. This commit adds a no-op handler to
make sure the message gets processed without throwing an error.
2025-02-27 01:46:13 +00:00
Brian Manifold
d0f0de0f8d refactor(portal): Allow breaking changes in Resources/Policies (#8267)
Why:

* Rather than using a persistent_id field in Resources/Policies, it was
decided that we should allow "breaking changes" to these entities. This
means that Resources/Policies will now be able to update all fields on
the schema without changing the primary key ID of the entity.
* This change will greatly help the API and Terraform provider
development.

@jamilbk, would you like me to put a migration in this PR to actually
get rid of all of the existing soft deleted entities?

@thomaseizinger, I tagged you on this, because I wanted to make sure
that these changes weren't going to break any expectations in the client
and/or gateways.

---------

Signed-off-by: Brian Manifold <bmanifold@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jamil <jamilbk@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-02-26 17:05:34 +00:00
Brian Manifold
eea7079776 fix(portal): Catch seat limit error in API fallback controller (#7783)
Why:

* The fallback controller in the API was not catching `{:error,
:seat_limit_reached}` being returned and was then generating a 500
response when this happened. This commit adds the condition in the
fallback controller and adds a new template for a more specific error
message in the returned JSON.
2025-01-17 00:13:45 +00:00
Brian Manifold
f114bc95cd refactor(portal): Add email as separate column on auth_identities table (#7472)
Why:

* Currently, when using the API, a user has no way of easily identifying
what identities they are pulling back as the response only includes the
`provider_identifier` which for most of our AuthProviders is an ID for
the IdP and not an email address. Along with that, when adding users to
an OIDC provider within Firezone, there is no check for whether or not
an identity has already been added with a given email address. By
creating a separate email column on the `auth_identities` table, it will
be very straight forward to know whether an email address exists for a
given identity, return it in an API response and allow the admin of a
Firezone account to track users (Identities) by email rather than IdP
identifier.

Fixes #7392
2024-12-13 17:26:47 +00:00
Brian Manifold
9711cf56c1 fix(portal): Fix update API endpoint for resources (#7493)
Why:

* The API endpoint for updating Resources was using
`Resources.fetch_resource_by_id_or_persistent_id`, however that function
was fetching all Resources, which included deleted Resources. In order
to prevent an API user from attempting to update a Resource that is
deleted, a new function was added to fetch active Resources only.

Fixes: #7492
2024-12-12 22:51:28 +00:00
Brian Manifold
06791d2d05 refactor(portal): API persistent IDs (#7182)
In order for the firezone terraform provider to work properly, the
Resources and Policies need to be able to be referenced by their
`persistent_id`, specifically in the portal API.
2024-11-07 20:45:56 +00:00
Thomas Eizinger
ce1e59c9fe feat(connlib): implement idempotent control protocol for gateway (#6941)
This PR implements the new idempotent control protocol for the gateway.
We retain backwards-compatibility with old clients to allow admins to
perform a disruption-free update to the latest version.

With this new control protocol, we are moving the responsibility of
exchanging the proxy IPs we assigned to DNS resources to a p2p protocol
between client and gateway. As a result, wildcard DNS resources only get
authorized on the first access. Accessing a new domain within the same
resource will thus no longer require a roundtrip to the portal.

Overall, users will see a greatly decreased connection setup latency. On
top of that, the new protocol will allow us to more easily implement
packet buffering which will be another UX boost for Firezone.
2024-10-18 15:59:47 +00:00
Andrew Dryga
b3c2e54460 feat(portal): New version of the WS control protocol (#6761)
TODOs:
- [x] Switch to sending messages instead of replies
- [ ] Do not hide pre-filtered resources and render them with an error
instead (in case we will want to expose that on a client later)
- [x] Figure out how to generate PSK so that it stays across WS
connections
2024-10-16 10:57:54 -06:00
Andrew Dryga
1abfa10fb7 fix(portal): UX improvements (#7013)
This PR accumulates lots of small UX fixes from #6645.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jamil Bou Kheir <jamilbk@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-10-14 11:32:44 -06:00