Automatic merge from submit-queue
DaemonSet ObservedGeneration
Extracting ObserverdGeneration part from #31693. It also implements #7328 for DaemonSets.
cc @kargakis
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39351, 39322)
Remove the deprecated --reconcile-cidr flag from kubelet
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Removes the `--reconcile-cidr` flag that has been deprecated since v1.5
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
The `--reconcile-cidr` kubelet flag was removed since it had been deprecated since v1.5
```
@thockin
Since we just want to get volume name info, each volume name just need to added once. desiredStateOfWorld.GetVolumesToMount() will return volume and pod binding info,
if one volume is mounted to several pods, the volume name will be return several times. That is not what we want in this function.
We can add a new function to only get the volume name info or judge whether the volume name is added to the desiredVolumesMap array.
drop SetNodeStatus() Since it is never called now. klet.defaultNodeStatusFuncs() is set to klet.setNodeStatusFuncs now and setNodeStatus() function is called by other functions.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39150, 38615)
Add work queues to PV controller
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead, where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
GCE PD names generated by Kubernetes are guaranteed to be unique - they
contain name of the cluster and UID of the PVC that is behind it.
Presence of a GCE PD that has the same name as we want to provision
indicates that previous provisioning did not go well and most probably
the controller manager process was restarted in the meantime.
Kubernetes should reuse this volume and not provision a new one.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37959, 36221)
Recycle Pod Template Check
The kube-controller-manager has two command line arguments (--pv-recycler-pod-template-filepath-hostpath and --pv-recycler-pod-template-filepath-nfs) that specify a recycle pod template. The recycle pod template may not contain the volume that shall be recycled.
A check is added to make sure that the recycle pod template contains at least a volume.
cc: @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Kubelet: add image ref to ImageService interfaces
This PR adds image ref (digest or ID, depending on runtime) to PullImage result, and pass image ref in CreateContainer instead of image name. It also
* Adds image ref to CRI's PullImageResponse
* Updates related image puller
* Updates related testing utilities
~~One remaining issue is: it breaks some e2e tests because they [checks image repoTags](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e/framework/util.go#L1941) while docker always returns digest in this PR. Should we update e2e test or continue to return repoTags in `containerStatuses.image`?~~
Fixes#38833.
previously the formatting was broken for labels.Parse() function. I
fixed the spacing so it will format correctly for the generated go docs.
There was also a dangling "]" at the end of the first line so i deleted
it.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/genericapiserver
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @nikhiljindal
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39307, 39300)
kubenet: define KubenetPluginName for all platforms
This PR moved KubenetPluginName to a general file for all platforms.
Fixes#39299.
cc/ @yifan-gu @freehan
Automatic merge from submit-queue
dockertools: don't test linux-specific cases on OSX
There are a few test cases in dockertools are linux-specific. This PR moves them to docker_manager_linux_test.go
Fixes#39183.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39053, 36446)
CRI: clarify purpose of annotations
Add language to make it explicit that annotations are not to be altered
by runtimes, and should only be used for features that are opaque to the
Kubernetes APIs. Unfortunately there are currently exceptions
introduced in [1][1], but this change makes it clear that they are to be
changed and that no more such semantic-affecting annotations should be
introduced.
In the spirit of the discussion and conclusion in [2][2].
Also captures the link between the annotations returned by various
status queries and those supplied in associated configs.
[1]: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/34819
[2]: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/30819#issuecomment-253369441
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39053, 36446)
fix --no-header help description
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
the current description is
> --no-headers=false: When using the default or custom-column output format, don't print headers.
but ,
> kubectl get po
the header has been printing , so the default condition is printing headers.
> kubectl get po --no-headers=true
the header has been not printing
> kubectl get po --no-headers=false
the header has been printing
So , I fixed the help description
Thanks.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
