Futility needs to link against both vboot1/vboot2.0 and vboot2.1
functions. This was easy in the past because it did (vboot1 +
vboot2.1) and there's no overlap.
In replacing vboot1 function calls and structs with vboot2.0, now there
are symbol collisions between vboot2.0 and vboot2.1. For example, both
of them use a struct called vb2_signature, but the structs are defined
differently. Functions which operate on those structs also overload.
Rename the vb2.1 structs to start with vb21_ instead of vb2_. Do the
same for vb2.1 functions which operate on vb2.1 data.
BUG=chromium:611535
BRANCH=none
TEST=make runtests
Change-Id: I24defd87cbd9ef64239faf1a8e98ab2372d27539
Signed-off-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/347458
Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@google.com>
Now that lib20 and lib21 are distinct, they can have overlapping
struct names. This will be cleaner in the long run, since vboot 2.0
(lib20) is just a temporary stepping stone to vboot 2.1 (lib21). It
would be a shame to need to carry around the overhead of that extra
digit forever.
No functional changes, just a lot of renaming.
BUG=chromium:423882
BRANCH=none
TEST=make runtests && VBOOT2=1 make runtests (works with/withoug VBOOT2 flag)
And compile firmware for veyron_pinky
Change-Id: I25f348fd31e32d08ca576836dfdd1278828765a1
Signed-off-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/233183
Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
This is part 1 of a series of 4 changes which rearrange the vboot2
files and unit tests so that we can more cleanly switch over from
old-style structs to new-style structs.
No functional changes, just shuffling around code.
BUG=chromium:423882
BRANCH=none
TEST=make runtests && VBOOT2=1 make runtests (works with/withoug VBOOT2 flag)
And build firmware for veyron_pinky.
Change-Id: I170d737bf151a6bafe61cde23b3d2f7a3fae43ce
Signed-off-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/232978
Reviewed-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@chromium.org>
