With newer PD chips and different update mechanisms, we can no longer
guarantee that the "hash" (really just a sort of version identifier) of
an EC-RW image will always be a SHA256. This patch removes any hardcoded
assumptions about that from vboot, and instead accepts any hash size
returned by VbExEcHashImage() and VbExEcGetExpectedImageHash().
It also removes the assumption that the hash can be regenerated by
running SHA256 over the full image returned by VbExEcGetExpectedImage().
We can thus no longer support VBERROR_EC_GET_EXPECTED_HASH_FROM_IMAGE,
which is fine since that functionality hasn't been needed for years and
there would be no reason why we might need it in the future. This also
allows simplifying the code flow of EcUpdateImage() a bit (since you can
really just return very early if you already figured out that you don't
need to update).
BRANCH=None
BUG=chrome-os-partner:53780
TEST=Tested software sync on Oak both after cold and warm boot.
Change-Id: I498f3d39085a38740734fff9f2d1a186a0801489
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/348001
Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Allow the AP to sync and verify the EC read only image after updating
the rewritable image.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:48703
BRANCH=none
TEST=manual
1. Update EC to a new version
2. rebuild EC code
3. Update AP firmware
4. Reboot and check that the RO image is updated after the RW image is
updated.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:319213
Change-Id: I774ef25320103f20d8c7d1c180a220dd0819c04d
Signed-off-by: Mary Ruthven <mruthven@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/320614
Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
This change will be used to support EC-RO software sync by allowing for
access to the readonly region of firmware. Currently only the writable
section is accessed by vboot using VB_SELECT_FIRMWARE_A and B.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:48703
BRANCH=none
TEST=built on jerry and check that the RO hash can be read and the image
can be updated.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:319185,CL:320425,CL:320598
Change-Id: Ic3942d86b65da3123798cfd11a78056f5dab6699
Signed-off-by: Mary Ruthven <mruthven@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/319213
Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
This will be used in subsequent CLs to support PD software sync. For
now, only devidx=0 is used.
This changes the external vboot API, so must be checked in at the same
time as changes to the u-boot and depthcharge implementations. For
now, those implementations should simply check if devidx=0 and fail if
it's not.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30079
BRANCH=none
TEST=make runtests
CQ-DEPEND=CL:208195,CL:208196
Change-Id: Iad3be9d676ac224c4582669bcd67176b39f75c73
Signed-off-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/208210
Reviewed-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@chromium.org>
It's possible for the AP to get updated and remove the RO-normal flag
without needing to update EC-RW firmware - for example, if it only
needs to update the BIOS. In this case, the EC doesn't need update,
but does need to jump to its RW firmware. But if the EC is already
booted RO-normal with jump disabled, it will refuse that request and
go to recovery mode.
The fix is simply to check if the request to jump to RW requires the
EC to cold-boot first, and pass through that error code to the caller.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:22617
BRANCH=none (affects all platforms, but only in this odd case, and this
is a change to the RW portion of the code)
TEST=pass new unit test which triggers this condition
Change-Id: Ia8d64dff784a9135ef23f6eb26bbca4ad9df57c3
Signed-off-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170168
Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
TEST=Built and booted Peppy. Ran flashrom from user space and
verified the EC firmware was updated after reboot.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:172651, CL:172652, CL:178324
BRANCH=none
BUG=chromium:325286
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ia73da70dbf3abb5ced48666e86715c8d24a431a0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/172635
Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@google.com>
Add checks that the vboot library does not leak memory. This works by
tracking VbExMalloc() calls and making sure that they have an associated
VbExFree().
Adjust host_signature to use VbExFree() instead of free(), so that this
scheme works correctly for existing code.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:21115
BRANCH=pit
TEST=FEATURES=test emerge-peach_pit vboot_reference
Change-Id: I6ccccfbcc162fc43fb75862cd0eddad78ce8b18a
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/66175
This means that in normal mode the system will boot all the way to the
OS before shutting down.
In developer or recovery modes, the BIOS screens will still check for
shutdown requested and shut down if so. This is necessary in
developer mode for security reasons, and because there's no guarantee
that a dev OS will still pay attention to the lid switch.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:17521
BRANCH=spring
TEST=make runtests; unit tests pass
Change-Id: I0698b659ad0febcf73043f1e8c5b98681c1bc5ba
Signed-off-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/58109
Previously,
1) AP-RO, EC-RO -> checked
2) AP-RW, EC-RO transition to EC-RW -> checked
3) AP-RW, EC-RW already -> NOT checked
Now, (3) calls VbExIsShutdownRequested() as well.
This fix is needed to avoid inconsistent behavior of software sync
after we ship a RW update.
Whether we *should* actually shut down or not based on how/why we
booted is a separate issue to be addressed by the U-boot
implementation of VbExIsShutdownRequested() in a separate CL.
BUG=chromium-os:38645
BRANCH=all
TEST=make runtests
Manual testing also possible - force AP-RW firmware, then reboot with
lid closed. Previously, the first boot would shut down because of
(2), but subsequent reboots of the AP only wouldn't because of (3).
Change-Id: I226202f48d793b88a30ffa62731de878f8c22315
Signed-off-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/43044
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
