When another task is holding the lock, mutex_lock() should call
task_wait_event_mask() to wait only for TASK_EVENT_MUTEX events.
If it calls task_wait_event(), any pending events are silently
discarded while its waiting for the the lock.
BUG=chromium:435611
BRANCH=ToT,samus
TEST=make buildall -j, and:
Before this change, I watched the EC console while shutting down
and rebooting Samus. I saw the request event arrive:
[37.576295 LB lightbar_resume() requests 5 S3S0]
[46.055725 LB_version]
But the lightbar task never saw it. Adding a bunch of debug
messages showed that it was being lost in mutex_lock().
After this change, the event is delivered:
[30.167670 LB lightbar_resume() requests 5 S3S0]
[30.171009 LB cur_seq 2 S3 returned pending msg 5 S3S0]
[30.173816 LB running cur_seq 5 S3S0. prev_seq 2 S3]
[32.410073 LB cur_seq 5 S3S0 returned value 0]
[32.410865 LB running cur_seq 3 S0. prev_seq 2 S3]
[39.938388 LB_version]
Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I011838538960cc57171f0a3c4cdee113d156e9ff
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/231370
Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Our code base contains a lot of debug messages in this pattern:
CPRINTF("[%T xxx]\n") or ccprintf("[%T xxx]\n")
The strings are taking up spaces in the EC binaries, so let's refactor
this by adding cprints() and ccprints().
cprints() is just like cprintf(), except that it adds the brackets
and the timestamp. ccprints() is equivalent to cprints(CC_CONSOLE, ...)
This saves us hundreds of bytes in EC binaries.
BUG=chromium:374575
TEST=Build and check flash size
BRANCH=None
Change-Id: Ifafe8dc1b80e698b28ed42b70518c7917b49ee51
Signed-off-by: Vic Yang <victoryang@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/200490
Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Some section(entry point, interrupt vector, e-flash signature
and so on) of linker script file are not linked.
The start address of e-flash signature should always at 00000080h.
Default firmware treats VCC logic high to prevent pin 11 logic low
but use following functions.
(EC2I, KBC, SWUC, PMC, CIR, SSPI, UART, BRAM, and PECI)
Signed-off-by: Dino Li <dino.li@ite.com.tw>
BRANCH=none
BUG=none
TEST=Firmware can startup on IT8380 emulation board.
Change-Id: I9860ac5b99dcc6e9e00dbc9d1e79a141237b7789
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/190008
Reviewed-by: Alec Berg <alecaberg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Dino Li <dino.li@ite.com.tw>
Commit-Queue: Dino Li <dino.li@ite.com.tw>
Put each functions in a separate section by using -ffunction-sections,
then discard the non-referenced ones in the linker with -gc-sections.
Force keeping a few special symbols by using the KEEP() linker
directive.
This modification is not saving a lot of spaces per se, but will enable
larger code pruning with future optional features.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
BRANCH=none
BUG=none
TEST=make buildall, manually check discarded symbols in the .map file
and run on Spring and Link.
The size delta is the following:
Link: total 85.7k -> 84.9k (.text 60.3k -> 59.5k)
Spring: total 59.2k -> 57.2k (.text 44.4k -> 42.5k)
Change-Id: Ib6eb0d3f2cc4fc172c9fc26acac2e486921690a3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/189224
Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
When we are calling the re-scheduling routine at the end of an irq
handling routine, we need to ensure that the high registers are not
currently saved on the system stack.
On Cortex-M3/M4, the compiler is normally doing tail-call optimization
there and behaving properly, but this fixes the fact that insanely large
interrupt handling routines where sometimes not compile and not running
properly (aka issue 24515).
This also prepares for one more core-specific DECLARE_IRQ routine on
Cortex-M0.
Note: now on, the IRQ handling routines should no longer be "static".
Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:24515
TEST=make -j buildall
revert the workaround for 24515, see the issue happening only without
this CL.
Change-Id: Ic419369231925568df05815fd079ed191a5446db
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/189153
Reviewed-by: Vic Yang <victoryang@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Move the CLZ instruction emulation C code to the common directory, so it
can be reused for all CPU cores missing a CLZ instruction (e.g. CortexM0).
Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
BRANCH=none
BUG=none
TEST=run EC console on STM32F072B Discovery board with Cortex-M0 core,
and pass all available unit-tests on target.
Change-Id: Ief56cac7430fcb0fbced8a8925250c89cbd0bcfc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/188981
Reviewed-by: Alec Berg <alecaberg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Sometimes the toolchain tries to put a relocation which is not suitable
to access variables in a read-only section.
The nds32 gcc uses GP-relative signed 17-bit relocation to access
variables stored in .rodata (eg lwi.gp $r0, [ +gp ])
That's wrong since $gp is pointing in the middle of .data and .bss in
the SRAM, while .rodata is sitting in flash.
Since on IT8380, the flash is at 0x00000 and the SRAM is at 0x80000
(512kB further), the linker will fail trying to create the signed 17-bit
relocation (it detect that it needs to truncate it)
Force the compiler to put another relocation as a workaround for now.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:24378
TEST=./util/make_all.sh ; make BOARD=it8380dev
check "version" and "gpioget" on spring, link and it8380dev.
Change-Id: Ife50adf3a26be28f113292f73a1a70e8d74b5d8c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/176913
Reviewed-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
