Previously, email replies were handled inside workers. There was no
execution logs. This meant if emails silently failed (as reported by a
customer), we had no way to trace where the issue happened, the only
assumption was “no error = mail sent.”
By moving email handling into jobs, we now have proper execution logs
for each attempt. This makes it easier to debug delivery issues and
would have better visibility when investigating customer reports.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5538/emails-are-not-sentdelivered-to-the-contact
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
## Changelog
- Added conditional Active Record encryption to every external
credential we store (SMTP/IMAP passwords, Twilio tokens,
Slack/OpenAI hook tokens, Facebook/Instagram tokens, LINE/Telegram keys,
Twitter secrets) so new writes are encrypted
whenever Chatwoot.encryption_configured? is true; legacy installs still
receive plaintext until their secrets are
updated.
- Tuned encryption settings in config/application.rb to allow legacy
reads (support_unencrypted_data) and to extend
deterministic queries so lookups continue to match plaintext rows during
the rollout; added TODOs to retire the
fallback once encryption becomes mandatory.
- Introduced an MFA-pipeline test suite
(spec/models/external_credentials_encryption_spec.rb) plus shared
examples to
verify each attribute encrypts at rest and that plaintext records
re-encrypt on update, with a dedicated Telegram case.
The existing MFA GitHub workflow now runs these tests using the
preconfigured encryption keys.
fixes:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5453/encrypt-sensitive-credentials-stored-in-plain-text-in-database
## Testing Instructions
1. Instance without encryption keys
- Unset ACTIVE_RECORD_ENCRYPTION_* vars (or run in an environment where
they’re absent).
- Create at least one credentialed channel (e.g., Email SMTP).
- Confirm workflows still function (send/receive mail or a similar
sanity check).
- In the DB you should still see plaintext values—this confirms the
guard prevents encryption when keys are missing.
2. Instance with encryption keys
- Configure the three encryption env vars and restart.
- Pick a couple of representative integrations (e.g., Email SMTP +
Twilio SMS).
- Legacy channel check:
- Use existing records created before enabling keys. Trigger their
workflow (send an email / SMS, or hit the
webhook) to ensure they still authenticate.
- Inspect the raw column—value remains plaintext until changed.
- Update legacy channel:
- Edit one legacy channel’s credential (e.g., change SMTP password).
- Verify the operation still works and the stored value is now encrypted
(raw column differs, accessor returns
original).
- New channel creation:
- Create a new channel of the same type; confirm functionality and that
the stored credential is encrypted from
the start.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Changelog
When an agent bot webhook fails, we now flip any pending conversation
back to an open state so a human agent can pick
it up immediately. There will be an clear activity message giving the
team clear visibility into what went
wrong. This keeps customers from getting stuck in limbo when their
connected bot goes offline.
# Testing instructions
1. Initial setup: Create an agent bot with a working webhook URL and
connect it to a test inbox. Send a message from a
contact (e.g., via the widget) so a conversation is created; it should
enter the Pending state while the bot handles
the reply.
2. Introduce failure: Edit that agent bot and swap the webhook URL for a
dummy endpoint that will fail. Have the same
contact send another message in the existing conversation. Because the
webhook call now fails, the conversation should flip from Pending back
to Open, making it visible to agents. Also verify the activity message
3. New conversation check: With the dummy URL still in place, start a
brand-new conversation from a contact. When the
bot tries (and fails) to respond, confirm that the conversation appears
immediately as Open rather than remaining Pending. Also the activity
message is visible
4. Subsequent messages in open conversations will show no change
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5752/fix-nomethoderror-when-processing-video-files-in-slack-integration
#### Problem
When users shared video files (like MP4) through Slack, the `file_type`
method in `SlackMessageHelper` would return `nil` for unsupported file
types. This caused a `NoMethodError (undefined method 'to_sym' for nil)`
when the attachment was being processed, as the system expected a symbol
value for the `file_type` attribute.
#### Solution
- Added video file type support in the `file_type` method case statement
- Added `else` clause to default unknown file types to `:file` instead
of returning `nil`
- This ensures `file_type` always returns a symbol, preventing the
`to_sym` error
Changes searchkick callback behavior to check `should_index?` before
creating reindex jobs, preventing unnecessary job creation for messages
that don't need indexing (activity messages, unpaid accounts, etc.).
Previously, `callbacks: :async` created reindex jobs for all messages
(~5,100/min or 7.3M/day in production), which were then filtered by
`should_index?` inside the job worker - resulting in 98% wasted jobs,
Redis memory pressure, and avoidable p0 alerts.
Now, `should_index?` is checked before job creation via `after_commit`
callback, reducing job creation to actual incoming/outgoing messages
from paid accounts.
Changes:
- Disable automatic searchkick callbacks
- Add manual `after_commit` callback with `should_index?` condition
- Add specs to verify callback behavior
Expected impact:
- 98% reduction in sidekiq job creation (~7.3M → ~150K jobs/day)
- Reduced redis memory usage
- Same async indexing behavior for eligible messages
# Pull Request Template
## Description
* add Company model with validations for name, domain, description and
avatar
* Add database migration fo
* Implement endpoints for company CRUD operations
* Add optional company relationship for contacts
* Add test for models, controllers, factories and policies
* Add authorization policies restricting delete to admins
* support JSON API responses
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes #(cw-5650)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tests are implemented using `RSpec`
```
$ bundle exec rails db:migrate
$ bundle exec rspec spec/models/company_spec.rb spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb
```
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
This PR fixes URL parsing errors when WhatsApp template parameters
contain URLs with spaces or special characters. The solution adds proper
URL normalization using Addressable::URI before validation, which
automatically handles space encoding and special character
normalization.
Related with https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12462
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR increases the custom filter limit from 50 to 1000 per user
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="1264" height="71" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e12667bb-147c-4115-b8a8-9113fca471db"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5692/whatsapp-es-numbers-stuck-in-pending-due-to-premature-registration
### Problem
Multiple customers reported that their WhatsApp numbers remain stuck in
**Pending** in WhatsApp Manager even after successful onboarding.
- Our system triggers a **registration call**
(`/<PHONE_NUMBER_ID>/register`) as soon as the number is OTP verified.
- In many cases, Meta hasn’t finished **display name
review/provisioning**, so the call fails with:
```
code: 100, error_subcode: 2388001
error_user_title: "Cannot Create Certificate"
error_user_msg: "Your display name could not be processed. Please edit
your display name and try again."
```
- This leaves the number stuck in Pending, no messaging can start until
we manually retry registration.
- Some customers have reported being stuck in this state for **7+
days**.
### Root cause
- We only check `code_verification_status = VERIFIED` before attempting
registration.
- We **don’t wait** for display name provisioning (`name_status` /
`platform_type`) to be complete.
- As a result, registration fails prematurely and the number never
transitions out of Pending.
### Solution
#### 1. Health Status Monitoring
- Build a backend service to fetch **real-time health data** from Graph
API:
- `code_verification_status`
- `name_status` / `display_name_status`
- `platform_type`
- `throughput.level`
- `messaging_limit_tier`
- `quality_rating`
- Expose health data via API
(`/api/v1/accounts/:account_id/inboxes/:id/health`).
- Display this in the UI as an **Account Health tab** with clear badges
and direct links to WhatsApp Manager.
#### 2. Smarter Registration Logic
- Update `WebhookSetupService` to include a **dual-condition check**:
- Register if:
1. Phone is **not verified**, OR
2. Phone is **verified but provisioning incomplete** (`platform_type =
NOT_APPLICABLE`, `throughput.level = NOT_APPLICABLE`).
- Skip registration if number is already provisioned.
- Retry registration automatically when stuck.
- Provide a UI banner with complete registration button so customers can
retry without manual support.
### Screenshot
<img width="2292" height="1344" alt="CleanShot 2025-09-30 at 16 01
03@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1c417d2a-b11c-475e-b092-3c5671ee59a7"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
The test was failing because Current.contact was not being cleared when
testing system auto-resolution. Added Current.contact = nil to ensure
the system auto-resolution message is triggered instead of contact
resolution.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
With this change, the indexing would be separate from the search, so you
need to enable indexing on the cloud and run it. It should start
indexing the messages to ElasticSearch/OpenSearch. Once indexing is
completed, we can turn on the feature for the customer.
Make sure that the following is done when you deploy.
Set POSTGRES_STATEMENT_TIMEOUT=600s before you run the indexing.
1. Make sure that the account with advanced_search has
advanced_search_indexing enabled
```rb
Account.feature_advanced_search.each do |account|
account.enable_features(:advanced_search_indexing)
account.save!
end
```
2. Enable indexing for all accounts with paid subscription.
```rb
Account.where("custom_attributes ->> 'plan_name' IN (?)", ['Enterprise', 'Startups', 'Business']).each do |account|
account.enable_features(:advanced_search_indexing)
account.save!
end
```
3. Run indexing for all the messages.
```rb
Message.reindex
```
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This PR implements the **"Lock to Single Conversation"** option for
Telegram inboxes, bringing it to parity with WhatsApp, SMS, and other
channels.
- When **enabled**: resolved conversations can be reopened (single
thread).
- When **disabled**: new messages from a resolved conversation create a
**new conversation**.
- Added **agent name display** in outgoing Telegram messages (formatted
as `Agent Name: message`).
- Updated frontend to display agent name above messages in the dashboard
(consistent with WhatsApp behavior).
This fixes [#8046](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8046).
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Unit tests added in
`spec/services/telegram/incoming_message_service_spec.rb`
- Scenarios covered:
- Lock enabled → reopens resolved conversation
- Lock disabled → creates new conversation if resolved
- Lock disabled → appends to last open conversation
- Manual tests:
1. Create a Telegram conversation
2. Mark it as resolved
3. Send a new message from same user
4. ✅ Expected: new conversation created (if lock disabled)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Additional Documentation
For full technical details of this implementation, please refer to:
[TELEGRAM_LOCK_TO_SINGLE_CONVERSATION_IMPLEMENTATION_EN.md](./TELEGRAM_LOCK_TO_SINGLE_CONVERSATION_IMPLEMENTATION_EN.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5646/add-support-for-grouped-file-uploads-in-slack
Previously, when sending multiple attachments to Slack, we uploaded them
one by one. For example, sending 5 images would result in 5 separate
Slack messages. This created clutter and a poor user experience, since
Slack displayed each file as an individual message.
This PR updates the implementation to group all attachments from a
message and send them as a single Slack message. As a result,
attachments now appear together in one grouped block, providing a much
cleaner and more intuitive experience for users.
**Before:**
Each file uploaded as a separate Slack message.
<img width="400" height="800" alt="before"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c8c7f666-549b-428f-bd19-c94e39ed2513"
/>
**After:**
All files from a single message grouped and displayed together in one
Slack message (similar to how Slack natively handles grouped uploads).
<img width="400" height="800" alt="after"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0b1f22d5-4d37-4b84-905a-15e742317e72"
/>
**Changes**
- Upgraded Slack file upload implementation to use the new multiple
attachments API available in slack-ruby-client `v2.7.0`.
- Updated attachment handling to upload all files from a message in a
single API call.
- Enabled proper attachment grouping in Slack, ensuring related files
are presented together.
- If super admin updates a user email from super admin panel , it will
be confirmed automatically if confirmed at is present
- Also unconfirmed emails will be visible for super admins on dashboard
fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8958
This PR is the fix for MFA changes, to not generate auth tokens without
MFA verification in case MFA is enabled for the account
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Description
This pull request introduces an optional parameter, `phone_number_id`,
to the WhatsApp API call responsible for retrieving media. The addition
of this parameter allows for greater flexibility when interacting with
the WhatsApp API, as it can now accommodate scenarios where specifying a
particular phone number ID is necessary. This change is backward
compatible and does not affect existing functionality if the parameter
is not provided.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
The changes were tested locally by invoking the WhatsApp media retrieval
API with and without the `phone_number_id` parameter. Both scenarios
were verified to ensure that:
- When `phone_number_id` is provided, the API call includes the
parameter and functions as expected.
- When `phone_number_id` is omitted, the API call continues to work as
before, maintaining backward compatibility.
No errors or warnings were observed during testing, and all relevant
unit tests passed successfully.
## Checklist
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
when filtering contacts by phone number a + is always added to the
begining of the query, this means that the filtering breaks if the
complete phone number with international code and + is entered
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Updated automated tests
Tested manually with contact filtering UI
## Checklist:
- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [X] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [X] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [X] My changes generate no new warnings
- [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [X] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [X] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Ensure messages go to correct conversation when receive multi user in 1
LINE webhook.
base on
[document](https://developers.line.biz/en/reference/messaging-api/#webhook-event-objects:~:text=There%20is%20not%20necessarily%20one%20user%20per%20webhook).
it said
```
There is not necessarily one user per webhook.
A message event from person A and a follow event from person B may be in the same webhook.
```
this PR has 1 break changes.
In old version. when receive
[follow](https://developers.line.biz/en/reference/messaging-api/#follow-event)
event, it will create conversation with no messages.
After this PR. when receive follow event, it will not create
conversation, contact and messages
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
add test case.
and follow event test by delete conversation, and block and unblock line
account
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: mix5003 <mix5003@debian.debian>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes the incorrect contact access in conversations listing API.
Cause:
- `undefined method 'conversations' for nil` error because `@contact` is
not initialized
Solution:
- Using `@contact_inbox` to access `@contact`
- `@contact_inbox` is properly set in the parent controller's
`set_contact_inbox` method
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4185/incorrect-contact-access-pattern-in
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This pull request allow LINE to receive files.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
add testcase. and test manually by myself.
in case you want to test in android, use native share method to share
files to LINE.
you can share more file types to LINE (native line share only send
image,video and audio).
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: mix5003 <mix5003@debian.debian>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Summary
- update the admin notification base mailer spec to ignore ordering when
verifying administrator email addresses
- extend the channel and integrations admin notification mailer specs to
cover multiple administrators without relying on recipient order
------
https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68cc7457cf788326a765f116ceab1732
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Linear:
- https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/486
## Description
This PR implements Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) support for user
accounts, enhancing security by requiring a second form of verification
during login. The feature adds TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password)
authentication with QR code generation and backup codes for account
recovery.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added comprehensive RSpec tests for MFA controller functionality
- Tested MFA setup flow with QR code generation
- Verified OTP validation and backup code generation
- Tested login flow with MFA enabled/disabled
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
- Add support for using labels as an action event for automation
- Fix duplicated conversation_updated event dispatch for labels
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8539 and multiple
issues around duplication related to label change events.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This PR is part of https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12259. It
adds a default expiry of 180 days for tokens issued on the widget. The
expiry can be customized based on customer requests and internal
security requirements.
Co-authored-by: Balasaheb Dubale <bdubale@entrata.com>
We recently introduced the WhatsApp Embedded Signup flow in Chatwoot to
simplify onboarding. However, we discovered two important limitations:
Some customers’ numbers are already linked to an Embedded Signup, which
blocks re-use. Tech providers cannot onboard their own numbers via
Embedded Signup.
As a result, we need to support both Manual and Embedded Signup flows to
cover all scenarios.
### Problem
- Current UI only offers the Embedded Signup option.
- Customers who need to reuse existing numbers (already connected to
WABA) or tech providers testing their own numbers get stuck.
- Manual flow exists but is no longer exposed in the UX
**Current Embedded Signup screen**
<img width="2564" height="1250" alt="CleanShot 2025-08-21 at 21 58
07@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c3de4cf1-cae6-4a0e-aa9c-5fa4e2249c0e"
/>
**Current Manual Setup screen**
<img width="2568" height="1422" alt="CleanShot 2025-08-21 at 22 00
25@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/96408f97-3ffe-42d1-9019-a511e808f5ac"
/>
### Solution
- Design a dual-path UX in the Create WhatsApp Inbox step that:
- Offers Embedded Signup (default/recommended) for new numbers and
businesses.
- Offers Manual Setup for advanced users, existing linked numbers, and
tech providers.
<img width="2030" height="1376" alt="CleanShot 2025-09-01 at 14 13
16@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6f17e5a2-a2fd-40fb-826a-c9ee778be795"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
I've added the account_id filter to the
`get_agent_ids_over_assignment_limit` method. This optimization will
help the query leverage the existing composite index
`conv_acid_inbid_stat_asgnid_idx (account_id, inbox_id, status,
assignee_id)` for better performance.
**Before:**
```sql
HashAggregate (cost=224238.12..224256.27 rows=484 width=4)
Group Key: assignee_id
Filter: (count(*) >= 10)
-> Index Scan using index_conversations_on_inbox_id on conversations (cost=0.44..223963.67 rows=54891 width=4)
Index Cond: (inbox_id = ???)
Filter: (status = 0)
```
**After:**
```sql
GroupAggregate (cost=0.44..5688.30 rows=476 width=4)
Group Key: assignee_id
Filter: (count(*) >= 10)
-> Index Only Scan using conv_acid_inbid_stat_asgnid_idx on conversations (cost=0.44..5640.81 rows=5928 width=4)
Index Cond: ((account_id = ??) AND (inbox_id = ??) AND (status = 0))
```
Deleting large Accounts/Inboxes with object.destroy! can time out and
create heavy destroy_async fan-out; this change adds a simple pre-purge
that batch-destroys heavy associations first .
```
Account: conversations, contacts
Inbox: conversations, contact_inboxes
```
We use find_in_batches(5000), then proceeds with destroy!, reducing DB
pressure and race conditions while preserving callbacks and leaving the
behavior for non heavy models unchanged. The change is also done in a
way to easily add additional objects or relations to the list.
fixes:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-3106/inbox-deletion-process-update-the-flow
The system determines a user’s active account by checking the
`active_at` field in the `account_users` table and selecting the most
recently active account:
```ruby
def active_account_user
account_users.order(active_at: :desc)&.first
end
```
This works fine when all accounts have a valid active_at timestamp.
**Problem**
When a user is added to a new account, the `active_at` value is NULL
(because the account has never been explicitly activated). Ordering by
active_at DESC produces inconsistent results across databases, since
handling of NULL values differs (sometimes treated as high, sometimes
low).
As a result:
- Mobile apps (critical impact): `/profile` returns the wrong account.
The UI keeps showing the old account even after switching, and
restarting does not fix it.
- Web app (accidentally works): Appears correct because the active
account is inferred from the browser URL, but the backend API is still
wrong.
**Root Cause**
- The ordering logic did not account for NULL `active_at`.
- New accounts without active_at sometimes get incorrectly prioritized
as the “active” account.
**Solution**
Explicitly ensure that accounts with NULL active_at are sorted after
accounts with real timestamps by using NULLS LAST:
```ruby
def active_account_user
account_users.order(Arel.sql('active_at DESC NULLS LAST, id DESC'))&.first
end
```
- Accounts with actual `active_at` values will always be prioritized.
- New accounts (with NULL active_at) will be placed at the bottom until
the user explicitly activates them.
- Adding id DESC as a secondary ordering ensures consistent tie-breaking
when multiple accounts have the same `active_at`.
