The namespace the crictical pod was referring to was wrong, because it
was using the generated one instead of `kube-system`. This and the
resulting test condition is now fixed.
The test seems to run only in `ci-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-flaky` for now.
Closes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/109296
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
Doing the initialization once was not good enough because it was not guaranteed
that RunCustomEtcd gets called early enough, before there are other goroutines
which use gRPC. The data race for
test/integration/apiserver.TestWatchCacheUpdatedByEtcd was:
WARNING: DATA RACE
Read at 0x00000cfffb90 by goroutine 140052:
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog.V()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog/grpclog.go:41 +0x30
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog.(*componentData).V()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog/component.go:103 +0x4e
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport.(*http2Client).Close()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport/http2_client.go:955 +0xca
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport.(*http2Client).reader()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport/http2_client.go:1619 +0xbfb
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport.newHTTP2Client.func11()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport/http2_client.go:394 +0x47
Previous write at 0x00000cfffb90 by goroutine 145643:
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog.SetLoggerV2()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog/loggerv2.go:75 +0x104
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/framework.RunCustomEtcd.func2()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/framework/etcd.go:157 +0x33
sync.(*Once).doSlow()
/usr/local/go/src/sync/once.go:74 +0x101
sync.(*Once).Do()
/usr/local/go/src/sync/once.go:65 +0x46
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/framework.RunCustomEtcd()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/framework/etcd.go:156 +0xb97
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/apiserver.multiEtcdSetup()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/apiserver/watchcache_test.go:41 +0xc4
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/apiserver.TestWatchCacheUpdatedByEtcd()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/apiserver/watchcache_test.go:92 +0xa9
testing.tRunner()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1576 +0x216
testing.(*T).Run.func1()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1629 +0x47
This commit removes the legacy networkpolicy tests since they now have
complete appropriate coverage in the new netpol suite.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Stoycos <astoycos@redhat.com>
We have a e2e test which want to get a rate limit error. To do so, we
sent an abnormally high amount of calls in a tight loop.
The relevant test per se is reportedly fine, but wwe need to play nicer
with *other* tests which may run just after and which need to query the API.
If the testsuite runs "too fast", it's possible an innocent test falls in the
same rate limit watch period which was saturated by the ratelimit test,
so the innocent test can still be throttled because the throttling period
is not exhausted yet, yielding false negatives, leading to flakes.
We can't reset the period for the rate limit, we just wait "long enough" to
make sure we absorb the burst and other legit queries are not rejected.
Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
This releases the underlying resource sooner and ensures that another consumer
can get scheduled without being influenced by a decision that was made for the
previous consumer.
An alternative would have been to have the apiserver trigger the deallocation
whenever it sees the `status.reservedFor` getting reduced to zero. But that
then also triggers deallocation when kube-scheduler removes the last
reservation after a failed scheduling cycle. In that case we want to keep the
claim allocated and let the kube-scheduler decide on a case-by-case basis which
claim should get deallocated.
add integration test to wait for json without value
refactor JSON condition value parsing and validating
adjusting test to reflect the error message refactoring
ginkgo.By should be used for steps in the test flow. Creating and deleting CDI
files happens in parallel to that. If reported via ginkgo.By, progress reports
look weird because they contain e.g. step "waiting for...." (from the main
test, which is still on-going) and end with "creating CDI file" (which is
already completed).
This avoids the surprise of identical authorization checks within a
policy evaluating to different decisions during the same admission
pass, and reduces the overhead of repeatedly referencing the same
authorization check.
This runs workloads that are labeled as "integration-test". The apiserver and
scheduler are only started once per unique configuration, followed by each
workload using that configuration. This makes execution faster. In contrast to
benchmarking, we care less about starting with a clean slate for each test.
Merely deleting the namespace is not enough:
- Workloads might rely on the garbage collector to get rid of obsolete objects,
so we should run it to be on the safe side.
- Pods must be force-deleted because kubelet is not running.
- Finally, the namespace controller is needed to get rid of
deleted namespaces.
