Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41259, 41260)
kubeadm: changed manifest files to yaml
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Static Pods are currently stored as .json files in /etc/kubernetes/manifests. This PR instead writes them as YAML, as requested by the SIG.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes #https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/153
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38252, 41122, 36101, 41017, 41264)
Fix cluster-cidr flag
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fixes the kube-proxy daemonset config when using the `pod-network-cidr flag`. The return value of `getClusterCIDR` should be prefixed with a `-`.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
None
@luxas
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38252, 41122, 36101, 41017, 41264)
BootstrapSigner and TokenCleaner controllers
This is part of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/130 and is an implementation of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/189.
Work that needs to be done yet in this PR:
* [ ] ~~e2e tests~~ Will come in new PR.
* [x] flag to disable this by default
```release-note
Native support for token based bootstrap flow. This includes signing a well known ConfigMap in the `kube-public` namespace and cleaning out expired tokens.
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle @dgoodwin @roberthbailey @mikedanese
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41223, 40892, 41220, 41207, 41242)
kubeadm: preflight should only warn about unresolvable hostnames
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is quite often the case on AWS, and we really don't care if
the hostname is resolvable or not. It's not an easy requirement
to ask user to fix, and there is no functional penalty at the
Kubernetes level, also it's possible that users fixes their host
resolution eventually, we don't have to make them do so.
**Special notes for your reviewer**: @dmmcquay @luxas PTAL 👍
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40796, 40878, 36033, 40838, 41210)
kubeadm: added tests for preflight checks
**What this PR does / why we need it**: There hadn't been much care to add more unit tests as more preflight checks were added. I added tests that increased coverage from ~9% to ~71%
Adding unit tests is a WIP from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This is quite often the case on AWS, and we really don't care if
the hostname is resolvable or not. It's not an easy problem
to ask user to fix, and there is no functional penalty at the
Kubernetes level, also it's possible that users fixes their host
resolution eventually, we don't have to make them do so.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40917, 41181, 41123, 36592, 41183)
fix ca cert in kubeadm
[certificates] Valid certificates and keys now exist in "/etc/kubernetes/pki"
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41061, 40888, 40664, 41020, 41085)
kubeadm: Small cleanup and fixes, validate the service subnet
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Validate the minimum subnet cidr so there are always 10 available addresses
- Remove an old proxy arg function, add clustercidr to the proxy manifest and automatically calculate the dns ip
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@errordeveloper @pires @mikedanese @dmmcquay @dgoodwin
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41061, 40888, 40664, 41020, 41085)
kubeadm: added tests cert/pkiutil pkg
raised coverage from ~37% to ~77%
**What this PR does / why we need it**: added tests to cert/pkiutil pkg and raised coverage from ~37% to ~77%
Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41064, 41090, 41068, 41073, 40882)
kubeadm: updated tests in app/util pkg
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Tests did not follow the standard of being table driven. Updated to make future changes (Adding/deleting tests) easier as well as more readable
Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40385, 40786, 40999, 41026, 40996)
kubeadm: change os.Remove to os.RemoveAll
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This would not correctly clean out the tmp dir, since os.Remove doesn't recursively remove dirs, which could exist in the tmp dir.
Unit tests are a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39681, 39321, 41018, 40883)
kubeadm: app/util/template.go has unit tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**: There was a TODO tag about adding unit tests, but unit tests have been added and the coverage for that file is ~90%. Tag should be removed.
Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Kubeadm discovery remove error passing
**What this PR does / why we need it**: In the app/discovery there is some confusion about the passing of error values created in the discovery/token, discovery/https/ and discovery/file pkgs. Since they always return `nil` , it was very confusing in discovery/flags.go why to propagate them up as if there was a chance for them to return a value other than `nil`. This change makes it much more clear what is being passed.
I noticed this as I was making a sweep through trying to add more unit tests and it was very confusing to read the code.
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes #https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/141
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: fix reset error logging.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: while investigating https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/142 I realized error logging was misleading. This PR is meant to fix it.
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Refactoring the apiconfig and addons phases
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
First commit: Fix the defaulting for AuthorizationMode - **Ready for review**
Second commit: Refactoring the apiconfig and addons phases in kubeadm - **work in progress, broken at the moment**
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Please take a look at the first commit now. You can also see the direction I'm going with the addons and apiconfig phases.
For example, I'm using Go templates instead of creating native Go structs for kube-dns and kube-proxy now. The question is if I should do it for the RBAC rules as well, it might make sense there as well.
Converting the dns addon to a yaml spec makes it 100x easier to maintain when changes are made to the "upstream" DNS spec, and also more swappable. We could for instance have a configuration param for it for those who want a custom file, etc.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@mikedanese @pires @lukemarsden @errordeveloper @dgoodwin @liggitt @andrewrynhard
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40574, 40806, 40308, 40771, 39440)
kubeadm: kube-proxy needs to know the pod subnet CIDR
**What this PR does / why we need it**: `kube-proxy` 1.5 has a new flag `cluster-cidr` that isn't specified by `kubeadm`, thus resulting in bug https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/102.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/102
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @luxas @dmmcquay
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40574, 40806, 40308, 40771, 39440)
kubeadm: preflight check for incorrect FQDN
**What this PR does / why we need it**: There are a variety of system configuration errors (such as cloud-init bugs when deploying on AWS) which can cause hostname and uname -n to be wrong for a given host. This will cause kubeadm setup to fail in interesting and hard-to-figure-out ways (it doesn't fail until you start trying to set up DNS on the master, for example).
This PR adds a preflight check to test whether or not the server can reach itself using that name. This does not catch the case that the FQDN belongs to a different but valid server, but it would catch some of the cases.
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/135
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
