kube-proxy expose the metric network_programming_duration_seconds,
that is defined as the time it takes to program the network since
a a service or pod has changed. It uses an annotation on the endpoints
/endpointslices to calculate when the endpoint was created, however,
on restarts, kube-proxy process all the endpoints again, no matter
when those were generated, polluting the metrics.
To be safe, kube-proxy will estimate the latency only for those
endpoints that were generated after it started.
This change updates the OIDC authenticator code to use a subset of
the dynamiccertificates.CAContentProvider interface to provide the
root CA bytes. This removes the hard dependency on a file based CA
and makes it easier to use this code as a library.
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
(Resource|Verb)All are meaningless in the context of openapi spec. I saw
ResourceAll used in an RBAC policy.
Change-Id: I8ab5f230bed23be902f77cadee3fbcdec6b24064
1. Do not describe port type in message because lp.String() already has the
information.
2. Remove duplicate error detail from event log.
Previous log is like this.
47s Warning listen tcp4 :30764: socket: too many open files node/127.0.0.1 can't open port "nodePort for default/temp-svc:834" (:30764/tcp4), skipping it: listen tcp4 :30764: socket: too many open files
[issue]
When creating a NodePort service with the kubectl create command, the NodePort
assignment may fail.
Failure to assign a NodePort can be simulated with the following malicious
command[1].
$ kubectl create service nodeport temp-svc --tcp=`python3 <<EOF
print("1", end="")
for i in range(2, 1026):
print("," + str(i), end="")
EOF
`
The command succeeds and shows following output.
service/temp-svc created
The service has been successfully generated and can also be referenced with the
get command.
$ kubectl get svc
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S)
temp-svc NodePort 10.0.0.139 <none> 1:31335/TCP,2:32367/TCP,3:30263/TCP,(omitted),1023:31821/TCP,1024:32475/TCP,1025:30311/TCP 12s
The user does not recognize failure to assign a NodePort because
create/get/describe command does not show any error. This is the issue.
[solution]
Users can notice errors by looking at the kube-proxy logs, but it may be difficult to see the kube-proxy logs of all nodes.
E0327 08:50:10.216571 660960 proxier.go:1286] "can't open port, skipping this nodePort" err="listen tcp4 :30641: socket: too many open files" port="\"nodePort for default/temp-svc:744\" (:30641/tcp4)"
E0327 08:50:10.216611 660960 proxier.go:1286] "can't open port, skipping this nodePort" err="listen tcp4 :30827: socket: too many open files" port="\"nodePort for default/temp-svc:857\" (:30827/tcp4)"
...
E0327 08:50:10.217119 660960 proxier.go:1286] "can't open port, skipping this nodePort" err="listen tcp4 :32484: socket: too many open files" port="\"nodePort for default/temp-svc:805\" (:32484/tcp4)"
E0327 08:50:10.217293 660960 proxier.go:1612] "Failed to execute iptables-restore" err="pipe2: too many open files ()"
I0327 08:50:10.217341 660960 proxier.go:1615] "Closing local ports after iptables-restore failure"
So, this patch will fire an event when NodePort assignment fails.
In fact, when the externalIP assignment fails, it is also notified by event.
The event will be displayed like this.
$ kubectl get event
LAST SEEN TYPE REASON OBJECT MESSAGE
...
2s Warning listen tcp4 :31055: socket: too many open files node/127.0.0.1 can't open "nodePort for default/temp-svc:901" (:31055/tcp4), skipping this nodePort: listen tcp4 :31055: socket: too many open files
2s Warning listen tcp4 :31422: socket: too many open files node/127.0.0.1 can't open "nodePort for default/temp-svc:474" (:31422/tcp4), skipping this nodePort: listen tcp4 :31422: socket: too many open files
...
This PR fixes iptables and ipvs proxier.
Since userspace proxier does not seem to be affected by this issue, it is not fixed.
[1] Assume that fd limit is 1024(default).
$ ulimit -n
1024
Fix some warnings from go-staticcheck.
"should use buffer.String() instead of string(buffer.Bytes()) (S1030)"
This warning is explained at this link.
https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks#S1030
