Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38149, 38156, 38150)
Remove girishkalele from most places
@matchstick you might need to help here. I am doing this because the bot is trying to create an issue assigned to @girishkalele but it cannot be created as he is not a member of the org any longer.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37328, 38102, 37261, 31321, 38146)
Fixes flake: wait for dns pods terminating after test completed
From #37194. Based on #36600. Please only look at the second commit.
As mentioned in [comment](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37194#issuecomment-262007174), "DNS horizontal autoscaling" test does not wait for the additional pods to be terminated and this may lead to the failure of later tests.
This fix adds a wait loop at the end of the serial test to ensure the cluster recovers to the original state. In the non-serial test it does not wait for the additional pods terminating because it will not affect other tests, given they are able to be run simultaneously. Plus wait for pods terminating will take certain amount of time.
Note this only fixes certain case of #37194. I noticed there are other failures irrelevant to dns autoscaler. LIke [this one](https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-serial/34/).
@bprashanth @Random-Liu
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37328, 38102, 37261, 31321, 38146)
Make thirdparty codec able to decode DeleteOptions
Fix#37278.
Without this PR, the gvk sent to the delegated codec will be the thirdparty one, which is not recognized by the delegated codec (usually api.Codecs).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38076, 38137, 36882, 37634, 37558)
Make logging for gcl e2e test more verbose
To help debug https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37241
CC @piosz
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38111, 38121)
remove rbac super user
Cleaning up cruft and duplicated capabilities as we transition from RBAC alpha to beta. In 1.5, we added a secured loopback connection based on the `system:masters` group name. `system:masters` have full power in the API, so the RBAC super user is superfluous.
The flag will stay in place so that the process can still launch, but it will be disconnected.
@kubernetes/sig-auth
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 36352, 36538, 37976, 36374)
test: update deployment helper to return better error messages
@kubernetes/deployment the problem with https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/36270 is that the selector key is never added in the deployment but this change would make it clearer.
This separation is necessary because "Federated Service DNS should be
able to discover a federated service" e2e test recently added a case
where it deletes the service from federation but not the shards from
the underlying clusters.
Because of the way cleanup was implemented in the AfterEach block
currently, we did not cleanup any of the underlying shards. However,
separating the two phases of the cleanup needs this separation.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38049, 37823, 38000, 36646)
Revert "test: update rollover test to wait for available rs before adopting"
This reverts commit 5b7bf78f3f from pr #36439 which appears to have mostly broken the gci-gke test.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37094, 37663, 37442, 37808, 37826)
Moved gobindata, refactored ReadOrDie refs
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Having gobindata inside of test/e2e/framework prevents external projects from importing the framework. Moving it out and managing refs fixes this problem.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#37007
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37997, 37939, 37990, 36700, 37258)
Add cluster-level AppArmor E2E test
My goal is to reuse this test for an automated cluster upgrade test.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Kubeadm unit tests for kubeadm/app/master package
Added unit tests for the kubeadm/app/master package testing functionality of tokens.go, kubeconfig.go, manifests.go, pki.go, discovery.go, addons.go, and apiclient.go.
This PR is part of the ongoing effort to add tests (#35025)
/cc @pires @jbeda
Automatic merge from submit-queue
test: update rollover test to wait for available rs before adopting
Scenario that happened in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/35355#issuecomment-257808460
-- Replica set that is about to be adopted has 2 out of 4 ready replicas
-- Deployment is created with 4 replicas, adopts pre-existing replica set, creates a new one, and starts rolling replicas over to the new replica set.
```
Nov 2 01:38:17.088: INFO: At 2016-11-02 01:38:04 -0700 PDT - event for test-rollover-deployment: {deployment-controller } ScalingReplicaSet: Scaled down replica set test-rollover-controller to 3
Nov 2 01:38:17.088: INFO: At 2016-11-02 01:38:04 -0700 PDT - event for test-rollover-deployment: {deployment-controller } ScalingReplicaSet: Scaled up replica set test-rollover-deployment-2505289747 to 1
Nov 2 01:38:17.088: INFO: At 2016-11-02 01:38:04 -0700 PDT - event for test-rollover-deployment-2505289747: {replicaset-controller } SuccessfulCreate: Created pod: test-rollover-deployment-2505289747-iuiei
Nov 2 01:38:17.088: INFO: At 2016-11-02 01:38:04 -0700 PDT - event for test-rollover-deployment-2505289747-iuiei: {default-scheduler } Scheduled: Successfully assigned test-rollover-deployment-2505289747-iuiei to gke-jenkins-e2e-default-pool-33c0400e-6q5m
Nov 2 01:38:17.088: INFO: At 2016-11-02 01:38:05 -0700 PDT - event for test-rollover-deployment: {deployment-controller } ScalingReplicaSet: Scaled up replica set test-rollover-deployment-2505289747 to 2
```
At this point there is no minimum availability for the Deployment (maxUnavailable is 1 meaning desired minimum available is 3 but we only have 2), and the new replica set uses a non-existent image. New replica set is scaled up to 1 (maxSurge is 1), then old replica set is scaled down by one, because cleanupUnhealthyReplicas observes that it has 2 unhealthy replicas - it can only scale down one though because the [maximum replicas it can cleanup is one](d87dfa2723/pkg/controller/deployment/rolling.go (L125)) (4+1-3-1). New replica set is scaled to 2. Available replicas are still 2 (third replica from the old replica set has yet to come up).
-- Deployment is rolled over with a new update. Test reaches for the WaitForDeploymentStatus check but there are only 2 availableReplicas (maxUnavailable is still violated).
This change makes the test wait for a healthy replica set before proceeding thus it should never hit the scenario described above.
@kubernetes/deployment
