mirror of
https://github.com/optim-enterprises-bv/kubernetes.git
synced 2025-11-03 19:58:17 +00:00
959 lines
35 KiB
Go
959 lines
35 KiB
Go
/*
|
|
Copyright 2015 The Kubernetes Authors.
|
|
|
|
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
|
|
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
|
|
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
limitations under the License.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
package e2e
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/errors"
|
|
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/resource"
|
|
metav1 "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1"
|
|
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/sets"
|
|
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/uuid"
|
|
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/api/v1"
|
|
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset"
|
|
"k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework"
|
|
testutils "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/utils"
|
|
|
|
. "github.com/onsi/ginkgo"
|
|
. "github.com/onsi/gomega"
|
|
_ "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const maxNumberOfPods int64 = 10
|
|
const minPodCPURequest int64 = 500
|
|
|
|
// variable set in BeforeEach, never modified afterwards
|
|
var masterNodes sets.String
|
|
|
|
type pausePodConfig struct {
|
|
Name string
|
|
Affinity *v1.Affinity
|
|
Annotations, Labels, NodeSelector map[string]string
|
|
Resources *v1.ResourceRequirements
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var _ = framework.KubeDescribe("SchedulerPredicates [Serial]", func() {
|
|
var cs clientset.Interface
|
|
var nodeList *v1.NodeList
|
|
var systemPodsNo int
|
|
var totalPodCapacity int64
|
|
var RCName string
|
|
var ns string
|
|
f := framework.NewDefaultFramework("sched-pred")
|
|
ignoreLabels := framework.ImagePullerLabels
|
|
|
|
AfterEach(func() {
|
|
rc, err := cs.Core().ReplicationControllers(ns).Get(RCName, metav1.GetOptions{})
|
|
if err == nil && *(rc.Spec.Replicas) != 0 {
|
|
By("Cleaning up the replication controller")
|
|
err := framework.DeleteRCAndPods(f.ClientSet, f.InternalClientset, ns, RCName)
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
BeforeEach(func() {
|
|
cs = f.ClientSet
|
|
ns = f.Namespace.Name
|
|
nodeList = &v1.NodeList{}
|
|
|
|
framework.WaitForAllNodesHealthy(cs, time.Minute)
|
|
masterNodes, nodeList = framework.GetMasterAndWorkerNodesOrDie(cs)
|
|
|
|
err := framework.CheckTestingNSDeletedExcept(cs, ns)
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
|
|
// Every test case in this suite assumes that cluster add-on pods stay stable and
|
|
// cannot be run in parallel with any other test that touches Nodes or Pods.
|
|
// It is so because we need to have precise control on what's running in the cluster.
|
|
systemPods, err := framework.GetPodsInNamespace(cs, ns, ignoreLabels)
|
|
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
|
|
systemPodsNo = 0
|
|
for _, pod := range systemPods {
|
|
if !masterNodes.Has(pod.Spec.NodeName) && pod.DeletionTimestamp == nil {
|
|
systemPodsNo++
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err = framework.WaitForPodsRunningReady(cs, metav1.NamespaceSystem, int32(systemPodsNo), 0, framework.PodReadyBeforeTimeout, ignoreLabels, true)
|
|
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
|
|
|
|
for _, node := range nodeList.Items {
|
|
framework.Logf("\nLogging pods the kubelet thinks is on node %v before test", node.Name)
|
|
framework.PrintAllKubeletPods(cs, node.Name)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// This test verifies that max-pods flag works as advertised. It assumes that cluster add-on pods stay stable
|
|
// and cannot be run in parallel with any other test that touches Nodes or Pods. It is so because to check
|
|
// if max-pods is working we need to fully saturate the cluster and keep it in this state for few seconds.
|
|
//
|
|
// Slow PR #13315 (8 min)
|
|
It("validates MaxPods limit number of pods that are allowed to run [Slow]", func() {
|
|
totalPodCapacity = 0
|
|
|
|
for _, node := range nodeList.Items {
|
|
framework.Logf("Node: %v", node)
|
|
podCapacity, found := node.Status.Capacity["pods"]
|
|
Expect(found).To(Equal(true))
|
|
totalPodCapacity += podCapacity.Value()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
currentlyScheduledPods := framework.WaitForStableCluster(cs, masterNodes)
|
|
podsNeededForSaturation := int(totalPodCapacity) - currentlyScheduledPods
|
|
|
|
By(fmt.Sprintf("Starting additional %v Pods to fully saturate the cluster max pods and trying to start another one", podsNeededForSaturation))
|
|
|
|
// As the pods are distributed randomly among nodes,
|
|
// it can easily happen that all nodes are satured
|
|
// and there is no need to create additional pods.
|
|
// StartPods requires at least one pod to replicate.
|
|
if podsNeededForSaturation > 0 {
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(testutils.StartPods(cs, podsNeededForSaturation, ns, "maxp",
|
|
*initPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: "",
|
|
Labels: map[string]string{"name": ""},
|
|
}), true, framework.Logf))
|
|
}
|
|
podName := "additional-pod"
|
|
createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: podName,
|
|
Labels: map[string]string{"name": "additional"},
|
|
})
|
|
waitForScheduler()
|
|
verifyResult(cs, podsNeededForSaturation, 1, ns)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// This test verifies we don't allow scheduling of pods in a way that sum of limits of pods is greater than machines capacity.
|
|
// It assumes that cluster add-on pods stay stable and cannot be run in parallel with any other test that touches Nodes or Pods.
|
|
// It is so because we need to have precise control on what's running in the cluster.
|
|
It("validates resource limits of pods that are allowed to run [Conformance]", func() {
|
|
nodeMaxCapacity := int64(0)
|
|
|
|
nodeToCapacityMap := make(map[string]int64)
|
|
for _, node := range nodeList.Items {
|
|
capacity, found := node.Status.Capacity["cpu"]
|
|
Expect(found).To(Equal(true))
|
|
nodeToCapacityMap[node.Name] = capacity.MilliValue()
|
|
if nodeMaxCapacity < capacity.MilliValue() {
|
|
nodeMaxCapacity = capacity.MilliValue()
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
framework.WaitForStableCluster(cs, masterNodes)
|
|
|
|
pods, err := cs.Core().Pods(metav1.NamespaceAll).List(metav1.ListOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
for _, pod := range pods.Items {
|
|
_, found := nodeToCapacityMap[pod.Spec.NodeName]
|
|
if found && pod.Status.Phase != v1.PodSucceeded && pod.Status.Phase != v1.PodFailed {
|
|
framework.Logf("Pod %v requesting resource cpu=%vm on Node %v", pod.Name, getRequestedCPU(pod), pod.Spec.NodeName)
|
|
nodeToCapacityMap[pod.Spec.NodeName] -= getRequestedCPU(pod)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var podsNeededForSaturation int
|
|
|
|
milliCpuPerPod := nodeMaxCapacity / maxNumberOfPods
|
|
if milliCpuPerPod < minPodCPURequest {
|
|
milliCpuPerPod = minPodCPURequest
|
|
}
|
|
framework.Logf("Using pod capacity: %vm", milliCpuPerPod)
|
|
for name, leftCapacity := range nodeToCapacityMap {
|
|
framework.Logf("Node: %v has cpu capacity: %vm", name, leftCapacity)
|
|
podsNeededForSaturation += (int)(leftCapacity / milliCpuPerPod)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
By(fmt.Sprintf("Starting additional %v Pods to fully saturate the cluster CPU and trying to start another one", podsNeededForSaturation))
|
|
|
|
// As the pods are distributed randomly among nodes,
|
|
// it can easily happen that all nodes are saturated
|
|
// and there is no need to create additional pods.
|
|
// StartPods requires at least one pod to replicate.
|
|
if podsNeededForSaturation > 0 {
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(testutils.StartPods(cs, podsNeededForSaturation, ns, "overcommit",
|
|
*initPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: "",
|
|
Labels: map[string]string{"name": ""},
|
|
Resources: &v1.ResourceRequirements{
|
|
Limits: v1.ResourceList{
|
|
"cpu": *resource.NewMilliQuantity(milliCpuPerPod, "DecimalSI"),
|
|
},
|
|
Requests: v1.ResourceList{
|
|
"cpu": *resource.NewMilliQuantity(milliCpuPerPod, "DecimalSI"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}), true, framework.Logf))
|
|
}
|
|
podName := "additional-pod"
|
|
createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: podName,
|
|
Labels: map[string]string{"name": "additional"},
|
|
Resources: &v1.ResourceRequirements{
|
|
Limits: v1.ResourceList{
|
|
"cpu": *resource.NewMilliQuantity(milliCpuPerPod, "DecimalSI"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
waitForScheduler()
|
|
verifyResult(cs, podsNeededForSaturation, 1, ns)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Test Nodes does not have any label, hence it should be impossible to schedule Pod with
|
|
// nonempty Selector set.
|
|
It("validates that NodeSelector is respected if not matching [Conformance]", func() {
|
|
By("Trying to schedule Pod with nonempty NodeSelector.")
|
|
podName := "restricted-pod"
|
|
|
|
framework.WaitForStableCluster(cs, masterNodes)
|
|
|
|
createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: podName,
|
|
Labels: map[string]string{"name": "restricted"},
|
|
NodeSelector: map[string]string{
|
|
"label": "nonempty",
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
waitForScheduler()
|
|
verifyResult(cs, 0, 1, ns)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
It("validates that a pod with an invalid NodeAffinity is rejected", func() {
|
|
By("Trying to launch a pod with an invalid Affinity data.")
|
|
podName := "without-label"
|
|
_, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).Create(initPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: podName,
|
|
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
|
NodeAffinity: &v1.NodeAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: &v1.NodeSelector{
|
|
NodeSelectorTerms: []v1.NodeSelectorTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
if err == nil || !errors.IsInvalid(err) {
|
|
framework.Failf("Expect error of invalid, got : %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Wait a bit to allow scheduler to do its thing if the pod is not rejected.
|
|
waitForScheduler()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
It("validates that NodeSelector is respected if matching [Conformance]", func() {
|
|
nodeName := getNodeThatCanRunPod(f)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to apply a random label on the found node.")
|
|
k := fmt.Sprintf("kubernetes.io/e2e-%s", string(uuid.NewUUID()))
|
|
v := "42"
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasLabel(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveLabelOffNode(cs, nodeName, k)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to relaunch the pod, now with labels.")
|
|
labelPodName := "with-labels"
|
|
_ = createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: labelPodName,
|
|
NodeSelector: map[string]string{
|
|
"kubernetes.io/hostname": nodeName,
|
|
k: v,
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// check that pod got scheduled. We intentionally DO NOT check that the
|
|
// pod is running because this will create a race condition with the
|
|
// kubelet and the scheduler: the scheduler might have scheduled a pod
|
|
// already when the kubelet does not know about its new label yet. The
|
|
// kubelet will then refuse to launch the pod.
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(framework.WaitForPodNotPending(cs, ns, labelPodName))
|
|
labelPod, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).Get(labelPodName, metav1.GetOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
Expect(labelPod.Spec.NodeName).To(Equal(nodeName))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Test Nodes does not have any label, hence it should be impossible to schedule Pod with
|
|
// non-nil NodeAffinity.RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution.
|
|
It("validates that NodeAffinity is respected if not matching", func() {
|
|
By("Trying to schedule Pod with nonempty NodeSelector.")
|
|
podName := "restricted-pod"
|
|
|
|
framework.WaitForStableCluster(cs, masterNodes)
|
|
|
|
createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: podName,
|
|
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
|
NodeAffinity: &v1.NodeAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: &v1.NodeSelector{
|
|
NodeSelectorTerms: []v1.NodeSelectorTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "foo",
|
|
Operator: v1.NodeSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{"bar", "value2"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, {
|
|
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "diffkey",
|
|
Operator: v1.NodeSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{"wrong", "value2"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Labels: map[string]string{"name": "restricted"},
|
|
})
|
|
waitForScheduler()
|
|
verifyResult(cs, 0, 1, ns)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Keep the same steps with the test on NodeSelector,
|
|
// but specify Affinity in Pod.Annotations, instead of NodeSelector.
|
|
It("validates that required NodeAffinity setting is respected if matching", func() {
|
|
nodeName := getNodeThatCanRunPod(f)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to apply a random label on the found node.")
|
|
k := fmt.Sprintf("kubernetes.io/e2e-%s", string(uuid.NewUUID()))
|
|
v := "42"
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasLabel(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveLabelOffNode(cs, nodeName, k)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to relaunch the pod, now with labels.")
|
|
labelPodName := "with-labels"
|
|
_ = createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: labelPodName,
|
|
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
|
NodeAffinity: &v1.NodeAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: &v1.NodeSelector{
|
|
NodeSelectorTerms: []v1.NodeSelectorTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "kubernetes.io/hostname",
|
|
Operator: v1.NodeSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{nodeName},
|
|
}, {
|
|
Key: k,
|
|
Operator: v1.NodeSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{v},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// check that pod got scheduled. We intentionally DO NOT check that the
|
|
// pod is running because this will create a race condition with the
|
|
// kubelet and the scheduler: the scheduler might have scheduled a pod
|
|
// already when the kubelet does not know about its new label yet. The
|
|
// kubelet will then refuse to launch the pod.
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(framework.WaitForPodNotPending(cs, ns, labelPodName))
|
|
labelPod, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).Get(labelPodName, metav1.GetOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
Expect(labelPod.Spec.NodeName).To(Equal(nodeName))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// labelSelector Operator is DoesNotExist but values are there in requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution
|
|
// part of podAffinity,so validation fails.
|
|
It("validates that a pod with an invalid podAffinity is rejected because of the LabelSelectorRequirement is invalid", func() {
|
|
By("Trying to launch a pod with an invalid pod Affinity data.")
|
|
podName := "without-label-" + string(uuid.NewUUID())
|
|
_, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).Create(initPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: podName,
|
|
Labels: map[string]string{"name": "without-label"},
|
|
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
|
PodAffinity: &v1.PodAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "security",
|
|
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpDoesNotExist,
|
|
Values: []string{"securityscan"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
TopologyKey: "kubernetes.io/hostname",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
if err == nil || !errors.IsInvalid(err) {
|
|
framework.Failf("Expect error of invalid, got : %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Wait a bit to allow scheduler to do its thing if the pod is not rejected.
|
|
waitForScheduler()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Test Nodes does not have any pod, hence it should be impossible to schedule a Pod with pod affinity.
|
|
It("validates that Inter-pod-Affinity is respected if not matching", func() {
|
|
By("Trying to schedule Pod with nonempty Pod Affinity.")
|
|
framework.WaitForStableCluster(cs, masterNodes)
|
|
podName := "without-label-" + string(uuid.NewUUID())
|
|
createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: podName,
|
|
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
|
PodAffinity: &v1.PodAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "service",
|
|
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{"securityscan", "value2"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
TopologyKey: "kubernetes.io/hostname",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
waitForScheduler()
|
|
verifyResult(cs, 0, 1, ns)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// test the pod affinity successful matching scenario.
|
|
It("validates that InterPodAffinity is respected if matching", func() {
|
|
nodeName, _ := runAndKeepPodWithLabelAndGetNodeName(f)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to apply a random label on the found node.")
|
|
k := "e2e.inter-pod-affinity.kubernetes.io/zone"
|
|
v := "china-e2etest"
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasLabel(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveLabelOffNode(cs, nodeName, k)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to launch the pod, now with podAffinity.")
|
|
labelPodName := "with-podaffinity-" + string(uuid.NewUUID())
|
|
_ = createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: labelPodName,
|
|
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
|
PodAffinity: &v1.PodAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "security",
|
|
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{"S1", "value2"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
TopologyKey: k,
|
|
Namespaces: []string{ns},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// check that pod got scheduled. We intentionally DO NOT check that the
|
|
// pod is running because this will create a race condition with the
|
|
// kubelet and the scheduler: the scheduler might have scheduled a pod
|
|
// already when the kubelet does not know about its new label yet. The
|
|
// kubelet will then refuse to launch the pod.
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(framework.WaitForPodNotPending(cs, ns, labelPodName))
|
|
labelPod, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).Get(labelPodName, metav1.GetOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
Expect(labelPod.Spec.NodeName).To(Equal(nodeName))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// test when the pod anti affinity rule is not satisfied, the pod would stay pending.
|
|
It("validates that InterPodAntiAffinity is respected if matching 2", func() {
|
|
// launch pods to find nodes which can launch a pod. We intentionally do
|
|
// not just take the node list and choose the first and the second of them.
|
|
// Depending on the cluster and the scheduler it might be that a "normal" pod
|
|
// cannot be scheduled onto it.
|
|
By("Launching two pods on two distinct nodes to get two node names")
|
|
CreateHostPortPods(f, "host-port", 2, true)
|
|
defer framework.DeleteRCAndPods(f.ClientSet, f.InternalClientset, ns, "host-port")
|
|
podList, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).List(metav1.ListOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
Expect(len(podList.Items)).To(Equal(2))
|
|
nodeNames := []string{podList.Items[0].Spec.NodeName, podList.Items[1].Spec.NodeName}
|
|
Expect(nodeNames[0]).ToNot(Equal(nodeNames[1]))
|
|
|
|
By("Applying a random label to both nodes.")
|
|
k := "e2e.inter-pod-affinity.kubernetes.io/zone"
|
|
v := "china-e2etest"
|
|
for _, nodeName := range nodeNames {
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasLabel(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveLabelOffNode(cs, nodeName, k)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to launch another pod on the first node with the service label.")
|
|
podName := "with-label-" + string(uuid.NewUUID())
|
|
|
|
runPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: podName,
|
|
Labels: map[string]string{"service": "S1"},
|
|
NodeSelector: map[string]string{k: v}, // only launch on our two nodes
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to launch another pod, now with podAntiAffinity with same Labels.")
|
|
labelPodName := "with-podantiaffinity-" + string(uuid.NewUUID())
|
|
createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: labelPodName,
|
|
Labels: map[string]string{"service": "Diff"},
|
|
NodeSelector: map[string]string{k: v}, // only launch on our two nodes, contradicting the podAntiAffinity
|
|
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
|
PodAntiAffinity: &v1.PodAntiAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "service",
|
|
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{"S1", "value2"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
TopologyKey: k,
|
|
Namespaces: []string{ns},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
waitForScheduler()
|
|
verifyResult(cs, 3, 1, ns)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// test the pod affinity successful matching scenario with multiple Label Operators.
|
|
It("validates that InterPodAffinity is respected if matching with multiple Affinities", func() {
|
|
nodeName, _ := runAndKeepPodWithLabelAndGetNodeName(f)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to apply a random label on the found node.")
|
|
k := "e2e.inter-pod-affinity.kubernetes.io/zone"
|
|
v := "kubernetes-e2e"
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasLabel(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveLabelOffNode(cs, nodeName, k)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to launch the pod, now with multiple pod affinities with diff LabelOperators.")
|
|
labelPodName := "with-podaffinity-" + string(uuid.NewUUID())
|
|
_ = createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: labelPodName,
|
|
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
|
PodAffinity: &v1.PodAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "security",
|
|
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{"S1", "value2"},
|
|
}, {
|
|
Key: "security",
|
|
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpNotIn,
|
|
Values: []string{"S2"},
|
|
}, {
|
|
Key: "security",
|
|
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpExists,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
TopologyKey: k,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// check that pod got scheduled. We intentionally DO NOT check that the
|
|
// pod is running because this will create a race condition with the
|
|
// kubelet and the scheduler: the scheduler might have scheduled a pod
|
|
// already when the kubelet does not know about its new label yet. The
|
|
// kubelet will then refuse to launch the pod.
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(framework.WaitForPodNotPending(cs, ns, labelPodName))
|
|
labelPod, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).Get(labelPodName, metav1.GetOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
Expect(labelPod.Spec.NodeName).To(Equal(nodeName))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// test the pod affinity and anti affinity successful matching scenario.
|
|
It("validates that InterPod Affinity and AntiAffinity is respected if matching", func() {
|
|
nodeName, _ := runAndKeepPodWithLabelAndGetNodeName(f)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to apply a random label on the found node.")
|
|
k := "e2e.inter-pod-affinity.kubernetes.io/zone"
|
|
v := "e2e-testing"
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasLabel(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveLabelOffNode(cs, nodeName, k)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to launch the pod, now with Pod affinity and anti affinity.")
|
|
pod := createPodWithPodAffinity(f, k)
|
|
|
|
// check that pod got scheduled. We intentionally DO NOT check that the
|
|
// pod is running because this will create a race condition with the
|
|
// kubelet and the scheduler: the scheduler might have scheduled a pod
|
|
// already when the kubelet does not know about its new label yet. The
|
|
// kubelet will then refuse to launch the pod.
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(framework.WaitForPodNotPending(cs, ns, pod.Name))
|
|
labelPod, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).Get(pod.Name, metav1.GetOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
Expect(labelPod.Spec.NodeName).To(Equal(nodeName))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Verify that an escaped JSON string of pod affinity and pod anti affinity in a YAML PodSpec works.
|
|
It("validates that embedding the JSON PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity setting as a string in the annotation value work", func() {
|
|
nodeName, _ := runAndKeepPodWithLabelAndGetNodeName(f)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to apply a label with fake az info on the found node.")
|
|
k := "e2e.inter-pod-affinity.kubernetes.io/zone"
|
|
v := "e2e-az1"
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasLabel(cs, nodeName, k, v)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveLabelOffNode(cs, nodeName, k)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to launch a pod that with PodAffinity & PodAntiAffinity setting as embedded JSON string in the annotation value.")
|
|
pod := createPodWithPodAffinity(f, "kubernetes.io/hostname")
|
|
// check that pod got scheduled. We intentionally DO NOT check that the
|
|
// pod is running because this will create a race condition with the
|
|
// kubelet and the scheduler: the scheduler might have scheduled a pod
|
|
// already when the kubelet does not know about its new label yet. The
|
|
// kubelet will then refuse to launch the pod.
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(framework.WaitForPodNotPending(cs, ns, pod.Name))
|
|
labelPod, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).Get(pod.Name, metav1.GetOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
Expect(labelPod.Spec.NodeName).To(Equal(nodeName))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// 1. Run a pod to get an available node, then delete the pod
|
|
// 2. Taint the node with a random taint
|
|
// 3. Try to relaunch the pod with tolerations tolerate the taints on node,
|
|
// and the pod's nodeName specified to the name of node found in step 1
|
|
It("validates that taints-tolerations is respected if matching", func() {
|
|
nodeName := getNodeThatCanRunPodWithoutToleration(f)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to apply a random taint on the found node.")
|
|
testTaint := v1.Taint{
|
|
Key: fmt.Sprintf("kubernetes.io/e2e-taint-key-%s", string(uuid.NewUUID())),
|
|
Value: "testing-taint-value",
|
|
Effect: v1.TaintEffectNoSchedule,
|
|
}
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateTaintOnNode(cs, nodeName, testTaint)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasTaint(cs, nodeName, &testTaint)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveTaintOffNode(cs, nodeName, testTaint)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to apply a random label on the found node.")
|
|
labelKey := fmt.Sprintf("kubernetes.io/e2e-label-key-%s", string(uuid.NewUUID()))
|
|
labelValue := "testing-label-value"
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode(cs, nodeName, labelKey, labelValue)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasLabel(cs, nodeName, labelKey, labelValue)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveLabelOffNode(cs, nodeName, labelKey)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to relaunch the pod, now with tolerations.")
|
|
tolerationPodName := "with-tolerations"
|
|
_ = createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: tolerationPodName,
|
|
Annotations: map[string]string{
|
|
"scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/tolerations": `
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
"key": "` + testTaint.Key + `",
|
|
"value": "` + testTaint.Value + `",
|
|
"effect": "` + string(testTaint.Effect) + `"
|
|
}
|
|
]`,
|
|
},
|
|
NodeSelector: map[string]string{labelKey: labelValue},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// check that pod got scheduled. We intentionally DO NOT check that the
|
|
// pod is running because this will create a race condition with the
|
|
// kubelet and the scheduler: the scheduler might have scheduled a pod
|
|
// already when the kubelet does not know about its new taint yet. The
|
|
// kubelet will then refuse to launch the pod.
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(framework.WaitForPodNotPending(cs, ns, tolerationPodName))
|
|
deployedPod, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).Get(tolerationPodName, metav1.GetOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
Expect(deployedPod.Spec.NodeName).To(Equal(nodeName))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// 1. Run a pod to get an available node, then delete the pod
|
|
// 2. Taint the node with a random taint
|
|
// 3. Try to relaunch the pod still no tolerations,
|
|
// and the pod's nodeName specified to the name of node found in step 1
|
|
It("validates that taints-tolerations is respected if not matching", func() {
|
|
nodeName := getNodeThatCanRunPodWithoutToleration(f)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to apply a random taint on the found node.")
|
|
testTaint := v1.Taint{
|
|
Key: fmt.Sprintf("kubernetes.io/e2e-taint-key-%s", string(uuid.NewUUID())),
|
|
Value: "testing-taint-value",
|
|
Effect: v1.TaintEffectNoSchedule,
|
|
}
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateTaintOnNode(cs, nodeName, testTaint)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasTaint(cs, nodeName, &testTaint)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveTaintOffNode(cs, nodeName, testTaint)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to apply a random label on the found node.")
|
|
labelKey := fmt.Sprintf("kubernetes.io/e2e-label-key-%s", string(uuid.NewUUID()))
|
|
labelValue := "testing-label-value"
|
|
framework.AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode(cs, nodeName, labelKey, labelValue)
|
|
framework.ExpectNodeHasLabel(cs, nodeName, labelKey, labelValue)
|
|
defer framework.RemoveLabelOffNode(cs, nodeName, labelKey)
|
|
|
|
By("Trying to relaunch the pod, still no tolerations.")
|
|
podNameNoTolerations := "still-no-tolerations"
|
|
createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: podNameNoTolerations,
|
|
NodeSelector: map[string]string{labelKey: labelValue},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
waitForScheduler()
|
|
verifyResult(cs, 0, 1, ns)
|
|
|
|
By("Removing taint off the node")
|
|
framework.RemoveTaintOffNode(cs, nodeName, testTaint)
|
|
|
|
waitForScheduler()
|
|
verifyResult(cs, 1, 0, ns)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
func initPausePod(f *framework.Framework, conf pausePodConfig) *v1.Pod {
|
|
pod := &v1.Pod{
|
|
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{
|
|
Name: conf.Name,
|
|
Labels: conf.Labels,
|
|
Annotations: conf.Annotations,
|
|
},
|
|
Spec: v1.PodSpec{
|
|
NodeSelector: conf.NodeSelector,
|
|
Affinity: conf.Affinity,
|
|
Containers: []v1.Container{
|
|
{
|
|
Name: podName,
|
|
Image: framework.GetPauseImageName(f.ClientSet),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
if conf.Resources != nil {
|
|
pod.Spec.Containers[0].Resources = *conf.Resources
|
|
}
|
|
return pod
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func createPausePod(f *framework.Framework, conf pausePodConfig) *v1.Pod {
|
|
pod, err := f.ClientSet.Core().Pods(f.Namespace.Name).Create(initPausePod(f, conf))
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
return pod
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func runPausePod(f *framework.Framework, conf pausePodConfig) *v1.Pod {
|
|
pod := createPausePod(f, conf)
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(framework.WaitForPodRunningInNamespace(f.ClientSet, pod))
|
|
pod, err := f.ClientSet.Core().Pods(f.Namespace.Name).Get(conf.Name, metav1.GetOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
return pod
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func runPodAndGetNodeName(f *framework.Framework, conf pausePodConfig) string {
|
|
// launch a pod to find a node which can launch a pod. We intentionally do
|
|
// not just take the node list and choose the first of them. Depending on the
|
|
// cluster and the scheduler it might be that a "normal" pod cannot be
|
|
// scheduled onto it.
|
|
pod := runPausePod(f, conf)
|
|
|
|
By("Explicitly delete pod here to free the resource it takes.")
|
|
err := f.ClientSet.Core().Pods(f.Namespace.Name).Delete(pod.Name, metav1.NewDeleteOptions(0))
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
|
|
return pod.Spec.NodeName
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func createPodWithNodeAffinity(f *framework.Framework) *v1.Pod {
|
|
return createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: "with-nodeaffinity-" + string(uuid.NewUUID()),
|
|
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
|
NodeAffinity: &v1.NodeAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: &v1.NodeSelector{
|
|
NodeSelectorTerms: []v1.NodeSelectorTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "kubernetes.io/e2e-az-name",
|
|
Operator: v1.NodeSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{"e2e-az1", "e2e-az2"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func createPodWithPodAffinity(f *framework.Framework, topologyKey string) *v1.Pod {
|
|
return createPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: "with-podantiaffinity-" + string(uuid.NewUUID()),
|
|
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
|
PodAffinity: &v1.PodAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "security",
|
|
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{"S1"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
TopologyKey: topologyKey,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
PodAntiAffinity: &v1.PodAntiAffinity{
|
|
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
|
|
{
|
|
LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
|
|
MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
|
|
{
|
|
Key: "security",
|
|
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpIn,
|
|
Values: []string{"S2"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
TopologyKey: topologyKey,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Returns a number of currently scheduled and not scheduled Pods.
|
|
func getPodsScheduled(pods *v1.PodList) (scheduledPods, notScheduledPods []v1.Pod) {
|
|
for _, pod := range pods.Items {
|
|
if !masterNodes.Has(pod.Spec.NodeName) {
|
|
if pod.Spec.NodeName != "" {
|
|
_, scheduledCondition := v1.GetPodCondition(&pod.Status, v1.PodScheduled)
|
|
// We can't assume that the scheduledCondition is always set if Pod is assigned to Node,
|
|
// as e.g. DaemonController doesn't set it when assigning Pod to a Node. Currently
|
|
// Kubelet sets this condition when it gets a Pod without it, but if we were expecting
|
|
// that it would always be not nil, this would cause a rare race condition.
|
|
if scheduledCondition != nil {
|
|
Expect(scheduledCondition.Status).To(Equal(v1.ConditionTrue))
|
|
}
|
|
scheduledPods = append(scheduledPods, pod)
|
|
} else {
|
|
_, scheduledCondition := v1.GetPodCondition(&pod.Status, v1.PodScheduled)
|
|
if scheduledCondition != nil {
|
|
Expect(scheduledCondition.Status).To(Equal(v1.ConditionFalse))
|
|
}
|
|
if scheduledCondition.Reason == "Unschedulable" {
|
|
notScheduledPods = append(notScheduledPods, pod)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func getRequestedCPU(pod v1.Pod) int64 {
|
|
var result int64
|
|
for _, container := range pod.Spec.Containers {
|
|
result += container.Resources.Requests.Cpu().MilliValue()
|
|
}
|
|
return result
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func waitForScheduler() {
|
|
// Wait a bit to allow scheduler to do its thing
|
|
// TODO: this is brittle; there's no guarantee the scheduler will have run in 10 seconds.
|
|
framework.Logf("Sleeping 10 seconds and crossing our fingers that scheduler will run in that time.")
|
|
time.Sleep(10 * time.Second)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO: upgrade calls in PodAffinity tests when we're able to run them
|
|
func verifyResult(c clientset.Interface, expectedScheduled int, expectedNotScheduled int, ns string) {
|
|
allPods, err := c.Core().Pods(ns).List(metav1.ListOptions{})
|
|
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
|
scheduledPods, notScheduledPods := framework.GetPodsScheduled(masterNodes, allPods)
|
|
|
|
printed := false
|
|
printOnce := func(msg string) string {
|
|
if !printed {
|
|
printed = true
|
|
return msg
|
|
} else {
|
|
return ""
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Expect(len(notScheduledPods)).To(Equal(expectedNotScheduled), printOnce(fmt.Sprintf("Not scheduled Pods: %#v", notScheduledPods)))
|
|
Expect(len(scheduledPods)).To(Equal(expectedScheduled), printOnce(fmt.Sprintf("Scheduled Pods: %#v", scheduledPods)))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func runAndKeepPodWithLabelAndGetNodeName(f *framework.Framework) (string, string) {
|
|
// launch a pod to find a node which can launch a pod. We intentionally do
|
|
// not just take the node list and choose the first of them. Depending on the
|
|
// cluster and the scheduler it might be that a "normal" pod cannot be
|
|
// scheduled onto it.
|
|
By("Trying to launch a pod with a label to get a node which can launch it.")
|
|
pod := runPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
|
|
Name: "with-label-" + string(uuid.NewUUID()),
|
|
Labels: map[string]string{"security": "S1"},
|
|
})
|
|
return pod.Spec.NodeName, pod.Name
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func getNodeThatCanRunPod(f *framework.Framework) string {
|
|
By("Trying to launch a pod without a label to get a node which can launch it.")
|
|
return runPodAndGetNodeName(f, pausePodConfig{Name: "without-label"})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func getNodeThatCanRunPodWithoutToleration(f *framework.Framework) string {
|
|
By("Trying to launch a pod without a toleration to get a node which can launch it.")
|
|
return runPodAndGetNodeName(f, pausePodConfig{Name: "without-toleration"})
|
|
}
|