Files
kubernetes/pkg/controller/volume/selinuxwarning/cache/volumecache_test.go
Jan Safranek 8791efc732 Update property name in metrics
selinux_volume_conflict should not have space in its label value - it's
harder to query for that value. Use SELinuxLabel as both human friendly (in
an event) and label value.
2024-11-06 11:16:06 +01:00

463 lines
15 KiB
Go

/*
Copyright 2024 The Kubernetes Authors.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
*/
package cache
import (
"reflect"
"sort"
"testing"
v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1"
"k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache"
"k8s.io/klog/v2"
"k8s.io/klog/v2/ktesting"
)
func getTestLoggers(t *testing.T) (klog.Logger, klog.Logger) {
// Logger with the default V(5), does not log dumps
logger, _ := ktesting.NewTestContext(t)
// Logger with V(dumpLogLevel), logs dumps
logConfig := ktesting.NewConfig(ktesting.Verbosity(dumpLogLevel))
dumpLogger := ktesting.NewLogger(t, logConfig)
return logger, dumpLogger
}
func sortConflicts(conflicts []Conflict) {
sort.Slice(conflicts, func(i, j int) bool {
return conflicts[i].Pod.String() < conflicts[j].Pod.String()
})
}
// Delete all items in a bigger cache and check it's empty
func TestVolumeCache_DeleteAll(t *testing.T) {
var podsToDelete []cache.ObjectName
c := NewVolumeLabelCache().(*volumeCache)
logger, dumpLogger := getTestLoggers(t)
// Arrange: add a lot of volumes to the cache
for _, namespace := range []string{"ns1", "ns2", "ns3", "ns4"} {
for _, name := range []string{"pod1", "pod2", "pod3", "pod4"} {
for _, volumeName := range []v1.UniqueVolumeName{"vol1", "vol2", "vol3", "vol4"} {
podKey := cache.ObjectName{Namespace: namespace, Name: name}
podsToDelete = append(podsToDelete, podKey)
conflicts := c.AddVolume(logger, volumeName, podKey, "label1", v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption, "csiDriver1")
if len(conflicts) != 0 {
// All volumes have the same labels and policy, there should be no conflicts
t.Errorf("AddVolume %s/%s %s returned unexpected conflicts: %+v", namespace, name, volumeName, conflicts)
}
}
}
}
t.Log("Before deleting all pods:")
c.dump(dumpLogger)
// Act: delete all pods
for _, podKey := range podsToDelete {
c.DeletePod(logger, podKey)
}
// Assert: the cache is empty
if len(c.volumes) != 0 {
t.Errorf("Expected cache to be empty, got %d volumes", len(c.volumes))
c.dump(dumpLogger)
}
}
type podWithVolume struct {
podNamespace string
podName string
volumeName v1.UniqueVolumeName
label string
changePolicy v1.PodSELinuxChangePolicy
}
func addReverseConflict(conflicts []Conflict) []Conflict {
newConflicts := make([]Conflict, 0, len(conflicts)*2)
for _, c := range conflicts {
reversedConflict := Conflict{
PropertyName: c.PropertyName,
EventReason: c.EventReason,
Pod: c.OtherPod,
PropertyValue: c.OtherPropertyValue,
OtherPod: c.Pod,
OtherPropertyValue: c.PropertyValue,
}
newConflicts = append(newConflicts, c, reversedConflict)
}
return newConflicts
}
// Test AddVolume and SendConflicts together, they both provide []conflict with the same data
func TestVolumeCache_AddVolumeSendConflicts(t *testing.T) {
existingPods := []podWithVolume{
{
podNamespace: "ns1",
podName: "pod1-mountOption",
volumeName: "vol1",
label: "label1",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption,
},
{
podNamespace: "ns2",
podName: "pod2-recursive",
volumeName: "vol2",
label: "label2",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyRecursive,
},
{
podNamespace: "ns3",
podName: "pod3-1",
volumeName: "vol3", // vol3 is used by 2 pods with the same label + recursive policy
label: "label3",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyRecursive,
},
{
podNamespace: "ns3",
podName: "pod3-2",
volumeName: "vol3", // vol3 is used by 2 pods with the same label + recursive policy
label: "label3",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyRecursive,
},
{
podNamespace: "ns4",
podName: "pod4-1",
volumeName: "vol4", // vol4 is used by 2 pods with the same label + mount policy
label: "label4",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption,
},
{
podNamespace: "ns4",
podName: "pod4-2",
volumeName: "vol4", // vol4 is used by 2 pods with the same label + mount policy
label: "label4",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption,
},
}
tests := []struct {
name string
initialPods []podWithVolume
podToAdd podWithVolume
expectedConflicts []Conflict // conflicts for the other direction (pod, otherPod = otherPod, pod) will be added automatically
}{
{
name: "new volume in empty cache",
initialPods: nil,
podToAdd: podWithVolume{
podNamespace: "testns",
podName: "testpod",
volumeName: "vol-new",
label: "label-new",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption,
},
expectedConflicts: nil,
},
{
name: "new volume",
initialPods: existingPods,
podToAdd: podWithVolume{
podNamespace: "testns",
podName: "testpod",
volumeName: "vol-new",
label: "label-new",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption,
},
expectedConflicts: nil,
},
{
name: "existing volume in a new pod with existing policy and label",
initialPods: existingPods,
podToAdd: podWithVolume{
podNamespace: "testns",
podName: "testpod",
volumeName: "vol1",
label: "label1",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption,
},
expectedConflicts: nil,
},
{
name: "existing volume in a new pod with existing policy and new conflicting label",
initialPods: existingPods,
podToAdd: podWithVolume{
podNamespace: "testns",
podName: "testpod",
volumeName: "vol1",
label: "label-new",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption,
},
expectedConflicts: []Conflict{
{
PropertyName: "SELinuxLabel",
EventReason: "SELinuxLabelConflict",
Pod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "testns", Name: "testpod"},
PropertyValue: "label-new",
OtherPod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "ns1", Name: "pod1-mountOption"},
OtherPropertyValue: "label1",
},
},
},
{
name: "existing volume in a new pod with new conflicting policy and existing label",
initialPods: existingPods,
podToAdd: podWithVolume{
podNamespace: "testns",
podName: "testpod",
volumeName: "vol1",
label: "label1",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyRecursive,
},
expectedConflicts: []Conflict{
{
PropertyName: "SELinuxChangePolicy",
EventReason: "SELinuxChangePolicyConflict",
Pod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "testns", Name: "testpod"},
PropertyValue: "Recursive",
OtherPod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "ns1", Name: "pod1-mountOption"},
OtherPropertyValue: "MountOption",
},
},
},
{
name: "existing volume in a new pod with new conflicting policy and new conflicting label",
initialPods: existingPods,
podToAdd: podWithVolume{
podNamespace: "testns",
podName: "testpod",
volumeName: "vol1",
label: "label-new",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyRecursive,
},
expectedConflicts: []Conflict{
{
PropertyName: "SELinuxChangePolicy",
EventReason: "SELinuxChangePolicyConflict",
Pod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "testns", Name: "testpod"},
PropertyValue: "Recursive",
OtherPod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "ns1", Name: "pod1-mountOption"},
OtherPropertyValue: "MountOption",
},
{
PropertyName: "SELinuxLabel",
EventReason: "SELinuxLabelConflict",
Pod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "testns", Name: "testpod"},
PropertyValue: "label-new",
OtherPod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "ns1", Name: "pod1-mountOption"},
OtherPropertyValue: "label1",
},
},
},
{
name: "existing pod is replaced with different non-conflicting policy and label",
initialPods: existingPods,
podToAdd: podWithVolume{
podNamespace: "ns2",
podName: "pod2-recursive",
volumeName: "vol2", // there is no other pod that uses vol2 -> change of policy and label is possible
label: "label-new", // was label2 in the original pod2
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption, // was Recursive in the original pod2
},
expectedConflicts: nil,
},
{
name: "existing pod is replaced with conflicting policy and label",
initialPods: existingPods,
podToAdd: podWithVolume{
podNamespace: "ns3",
podName: "pod3-1",
volumeName: "vol3", // vol3 is used by pod3-2 with label3 and Recursive policy
label: "label-new", // Technically, it's not possible to change a label of an existing pod, but we still check for conflicts
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption, // ChangePolicy change can happen when CSIDriver is updated from SELinuxMount: false to SELinuxMount: true
},
expectedConflicts: []Conflict{
{
PropertyName: "SELinuxChangePolicy",
EventReason: "SELinuxChangePolicyConflict",
Pod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "ns3", Name: "pod3-1"},
PropertyValue: "MountOption",
OtherPod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "ns3", Name: "pod3-2"},
OtherPropertyValue: "Recursive",
},
{
PropertyName: "SELinuxLabel",
EventReason: "SELinuxLabelConflict",
Pod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "ns3", Name: "pod3-1"},
PropertyValue: "label-new",
OtherPod: cache.ObjectName{Namespace: "ns3", Name: "pod3-2"},
OtherPropertyValue: "label3",
},
},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
logger, dumpLogger := getTestLoggers(t)
// Arrange: add initial pods to the cache
c := NewVolumeLabelCache().(*volumeCache)
for _, podToAdd := range tt.initialPods {
conflicts := c.AddVolume(logger, podToAdd.volumeName, cache.ObjectName{Namespace: podToAdd.podNamespace, Name: podToAdd.podName}, podToAdd.label, podToAdd.changePolicy, "csiDriver1")
if len(conflicts) != 0 {
t.Errorf("Initial AddVolume %s/%s %s returned unexpected conflicts: %+v", podToAdd.podNamespace, podToAdd.podName, podToAdd.volumeName, conflicts)
}
}
// Act
conflicts := c.AddVolume(logger, tt.podToAdd.volumeName, cache.ObjectName{Namespace: tt.podToAdd.podNamespace, Name: tt.podToAdd.podName}, tt.podToAdd.label, tt.podToAdd.changePolicy, "csiDriver1")
// Assert
expectedConflicts := addReverseConflict(tt.expectedConflicts)
sortConflicts(conflicts)
sortConflicts(expectedConflicts)
if !reflect.DeepEqual(conflicts, expectedConflicts) {
t.Errorf("AddVolume returned unexpected conflicts: %+v", conflicts)
c.dump(dumpLogger)
}
// Expect the pod + volume to be present in the cache
volume, ok := c.volumes[tt.podToAdd.volumeName]
if !ok {
t.Errorf("volume %s is not present in the cache", tt.podToAdd.volumeName)
}
podKey := cache.ObjectName{Namespace: tt.podToAdd.podNamespace, Name: tt.podToAdd.podName}
existingInfo, ok := volume.pods[podKey]
if !ok {
t.Errorf("pod %s is not present in the cache", podKey)
}
expectedPodInfo := podInfo{
seLinuxLabel: tt.podToAdd.label,
changePolicy: tt.podToAdd.changePolicy,
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(existingInfo, expectedPodInfo) {
t.Errorf("pod %s has unexpected info: %+v", podKey, existingInfo)
}
// Act again: get the conflicts via SendConflicts
ch := make(chan Conflict)
go func() {
c.SendConflicts(logger, ch)
close(ch)
}()
// Assert
receivedConflicts := []Conflict{}
for c := range ch {
receivedConflicts = append(receivedConflicts, c)
}
sortConflicts(receivedConflicts)
if !reflect.DeepEqual(receivedConflicts, expectedConflicts) {
t.Errorf("SendConflicts returned unexpected conflicts: %+v", receivedConflicts)
c.dump(dumpLogger)
}
})
}
}
func TestVolumeCache_GetPodsForCSIDriver(t *testing.T) {
c := NewVolumeLabelCache().(*volumeCache)
logger, dumpLogger := getTestLoggers(t)
existingPods := map[string][]podWithVolume{
"csiDriver1": {
{
podNamespace: "ns1",
podName: "pod1-mountOption",
volumeName: "vol1",
label: "label1",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption,
},
},
"csiDriver2": {
{
podNamespace: "ns2",
podName: "pod2-recursive",
volumeName: "vol2",
label: "label2",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyRecursive,
},
{
podNamespace: "ns3",
podName: "pod3-1",
volumeName: "vol3", // vol3 is used by 2 pods with the same label + recursive policy
label: "label3",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyRecursive,
},
{
podNamespace: "ns3",
podName: "pod3-2",
volumeName: "vol3", // vol3 is used by 2 pods with the same label + recursive policy
label: "label3",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyRecursive,
},
},
"csiDriver3": {
{
podNamespace: "ns4",
podName: "pod4-1",
volumeName: "vol4", // vol4 is used by 2 pods with the same label + mount policy
label: "label4",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption,
},
{
podNamespace: "ns4",
podName: "pod4-2",
volumeName: "vol4", // vol4 is used by 2 pods with the same label + mount policy
label: "label4",
changePolicy: v1.SELinuxChangePolicyMountOption,
},
},
}
for csiDriverName, pods := range existingPods {
for _, podToAdd := range pods {
conflicts := c.AddVolume(logger, podToAdd.volumeName, cache.ObjectName{Namespace: podToAdd.podNamespace, Name: podToAdd.podName}, podToAdd.label, podToAdd.changePolicy, csiDriverName)
if len(conflicts) != 0 {
t.Errorf("Initial AddVolume %s/%s %s returned unexpected conflicts: %+v", podToAdd.podNamespace, podToAdd.podName, podToAdd.volumeName, conflicts)
}
}
}
// Act
expectedPods := map[string][]cache.ObjectName{
"csiDriver1": {
{Namespace: "ns1", Name: "pod1-mountOption"},
},
"csiDriver2": {
{Namespace: "ns2", Name: "pod2-recursive"},
{Namespace: "ns3", Name: "pod3-1"},
{Namespace: "ns3", Name: "pod3-2"},
},
"csiDriver3": {
{Namespace: "ns4", Name: "pod4-1"},
{Namespace: "ns4", Name: "pod4-2"},
},
"csiDriver4": nil, // totally unknown CSI driver
}
for csiDriverName, expectedPodsForDriver := range expectedPods {
podsForDriver := c.GetPodsForCSIDriver(csiDriverName)
sort.Slice(podsForDriver, func(i, j int) bool {
return podsForDriver[i].String() < podsForDriver[j].String()
})
if !reflect.DeepEqual(podsForDriver, expectedPodsForDriver) {
t.Errorf("GetPodsForCSIDriver(%s) returned unexpected pods: %+v", csiDriverName, podsForDriver)
c.dump(dumpLogger)
}
}
}