mirror of
https://github.com/optim-enterprises-bv/kubernetes.git
synced 2025-12-01 22:03:54 +00:00
cfa6774540
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>. fix the create azure file pvc failure if there is no storage account in current resource group **What this PR does / why we need it**: When create an azure file PVC, there will be error if there is no storage account in current resource group. With this PR, a storage account will be created if there is no storage account in current resource group. **Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*: Fixes #56556 **Special notes for your reviewer**: 1. rephrase the code logic of `CreateFileShare` func. ``` if accountName is empty, then find a storage account that matches accountType if no storage account found, then create a new account else we only use user specified storage account create a file share according to found storage account ``` 2. Use func `getStorageAccountName` to get a unique storage account name by UUID, a storage account for azure file would be like `f0b2b0bd40c010112e897fa`. And in next PR, I will use this function to create storage account for azure disk, the storage account for azure disk would be like `d8f3ad8ad92000f1e1e88bd`. **Release note**: ``` fix the create azure file pvc failure if there is no storage account in current resource group ``` /sig azure /assign @rootfs
Deprecation Notice: This directory has entered maintenance mode and will not be accepting new providers. Cloud Providers in this directory will continue to be actively developed or maintained and supported at their current level of support as a longer-term solution evolves.
Overview:
The mechanism for supporting cloud providers is currently in transition: the original method of implementing cloud provider-specific functionality within the main kubernetes tree (here) is no longer advised; however, the proposed solution is still in development.
Guidance for potential cloud providers:
- Support for cloud providers is currently in a state of flux. Background information on motivation and the proposal for improving is in the github proposal.
- In support of this plan, a new cloud-controller-manager binary was added in 1.6. This was the first of several steps (see the proposal for more information).
- Attempts to contribute new cloud providers or (to a lesser extent) persistent volumes to the core repo will likely meet with some pushback from reviewers/approvers.
- It is understood that this is an unfortunate situation in which 'the old way is no longer supported but the new way is not ready yet', but the initial path is unsustainable, and contributors are encouraged to participate in the implementation of the proposed long-term solution, as there is risk that PRs for new cloud providers here will not be approved.
- Though the fully productized support envisioned in the proposal is still 2 - 3 releases out, the foundational work is underway, and a motivated cloud provider could accomplish the work in a forward-looking way. Contributors are encouraged to assist with the implementation of the design outlined in the proposal.
Some additional context on status / direction:
- 1.6 added a new cloud-controller-manager binary that may be used for testing the new out-of-core cloudprovider flow.
- Setting cloud-provider=external allows for creation of a separate controller-manager binary
- 1.7 adds extensible admission control, further enabling topology customization.