When user submits a request having a spacing smaller than the mode minimum spacing,
the consistent check raises an exception for bad service. This behaviour assumes that
the user knows the modes characteristics.
Instead it makes more sense to return an error code in the case when the user doesn't know
about the library details but only on modes names.
this is usefull for CANDI-optical POC use case
Signed-off-by: EstherLerouzic <esther.lerouzic@orange.com>
Change-Id: Ic7e02566a0cd5750a07752db7c318c29c62b3e1f
For this commit only the first element from the {N, M} list is read
and assigned.
This is better than not reading this value at all.
the commit also updates test_files and test data files with correct
values for the effective_freq_slot attribute
Signed-off-by: EstherLerouzic <esther.lerouzic@orange.com>
Change-Id: I1e60fe833ca1092b40de27c8cbfb13083810414e
When loading the equipment file in json_io.py we should raise an error
if an Edfa type_variety specifies a NF type_def that is not
implemented. This should also allow to remove the assert statement in
the _nf method in the Edfa class.
Change-Id: Ida0bb19829c0ee54ecbe3e2f74ea7c22eb24f6a2
Signed-off-by: Jonas Mårtensson <jonas.martensson@ri.se>
The equipment library has, so far, used completely different namespaces
for `Fiber` and `RamanFiber` definitions. It was possible to define a
"SSMF" fiber whose properties, such as CD or PMD, would differ when used
as a Fiber vs. the RamanFiber object in the networking topology. That is
likely a bug of the equipment library, so this patch makes sure that a
configuration like that cannot be used.
I came across this when working on the YANG support where both fiber
types are defined in a common namespace, and the difference between them
is determined by lack or presence of a sub-container with the Raman
properties.
Change-Id: I8e86bed80eb1794b8abd4e1ecd96398d395f81f2
A recent patch introduced the possibility to define an Edfa in the
topology file without specifying its type_variety:
https://review.gerrithub.io/c/Telecominfraproject/oopt-gnpy/+/488967
But with the current implementation, if a user specifies a type_variety
that is missing from the equipment configuration file (e.g. because of
a spelling mistake) this is silently ignored and the type_variety is
instead selected by auto design. I think this is not desired since it
can lead to confusing results. This patch proposes to raise an error
when the specified type_variety is missing while still allowing the user
to not specify type_variety or set type_variety = '' for selection by
auto design.
A recently introduced test actually does exactly this, i.e. it defines
Edfas with type_variety = 'std_high_gain' even though this type variety
does not exist in the equipment config file used by the test. Therefore
this patch also modifies the topology file used by that test.
Change-Id: I7d2a1aa6d633b62d51a99b07e8270cafcbad505f
Signed-off-by: Jonas Mårtensson <jonas.martensson@ri.se>
- add the per degree info using the EXACT next node uid as identifier
of the degree when a node is a roadm
- add the degree identifier on the propagate and on the call functions
- use the per degree target_pch_out_db defined in json entry for the
target power in network build
- verifies existence of the per degree power target in order to support
partial per degree target power definition
- correct test data files for expected auto design results that now
should include the per degree information, even if it is the same
for all degree.
- in order to enable per degree power definition on direction where
booster is not defined, enable the declaration of edfas in json without
specifying type variety
Signed-off-by: EstherLerouzic <esther.lerouzic@orange.com>
Change-Id: I5004cbb250ca5fd6b6498ac9d4b9c4f28a65efee
Since 30234f913c, the code just added the
"system margins" to each transponder's minimal required OSNR. That's
simple and straightforward, but I think that mutating "equipment
library" in response to a "global simulation parameter" is not really
the right way to go.
Make this explicit; always check the resulting OSNR against the
transponder's minimum plus the margin.
I got into this when checking the fixups that are performed within the
JSON loader. I don't think that the JSON loader is an appropriate place
for this.
Change-Id: Ic8f8385cbbb29dc0d769462f17caad47c2b36940
There's no reason for this, in fact, the code got easier to read when
that detour to disk gets removed.
Change-Id: I45db215898da962e625a7fea6eda57744e21ff8a
This is something which got added in bc9eee32, but it never got
finalized to have a user-visible effect. To the best of my knowledge, it
only created a file which was never used.
I removed code which created that file in 0d542f22, so let's clean up
the rest.
I think this should also restore functionality of running convert.py in
a standalone mode. Looking at the ArgParser, the invocation never
considered the names_matching parameter.
Change-Id: Id0f4aa1db2d22233f74fb273176168a16ace4072
It's a bad habit to write files into the source code repository. It will
also become impossible if gnpy is installed into a systemwide, possible
read-only location.
The old behavior can be reactivated by using an extra option to tell
GNPy where to put the generated file.
Change-Id: I9ad43890ca5886f516885de5938a4778870a06c5
We agreed that `gnpy.core` should only contain stuff for propagating
wavelengths. Conceptually, JSON parsing and even instantiating these
network elements from data obtained through JSON is *not* something that
is on the same level -- and this will become more important when we move
into YANG format in future.
Also, instead of former `gnpy.core.equipment.common`, use
`gnpy.tools.json_io._JsonThing`. It is not really an awesome name :),
but I think it sucks less than a thing called "common" which would be no
really longer any "common" in that new file.
Change-Id: Ifd85ea4423d418c14c8fae3d5054c5cb5638d283
