add some text in the docs to explain that tilt can be expressed
vs freq or lambda depending on context:
advanced_model expresses dgt as a function of frequency,
while tilt target is still defined vs wavelength (common usage).
Change the variable to have explicit name when it is per wavelength,
or add a comment to help identifyper wavelength or per frequency
variables.
Signed-off-by: EstherLerouzic <esther.lerouzic@orange.com>
Change-Id: I7727f00b38244152b95954e981cc9da096bb3d1d
As Gert proposed on the latest call, submitting patches could be a bit
high of a barrier to go over. Let's make it clear that we're here to
help those vendors who are willing to collaborate.
Change-Id: Ieac1c91480143c553ffb25dd1c46e94022bf5ba3
The NF calculated by the preamp model is compliant with the MW-MW noise
mask in the OpenROADM MSA spec. The booster is noise-free, which is
modeled by setting the NF to zero (-inf in dB units). This is obviously
unphysical but it is the simplest way to model the total noise
contribution from a ROADM, including preamp and booster, that is
compliant with the the OpenROADM MSA.
This also introduces two new EDFA type varieties,
"openroadm_mw_mw_preamp" and "openroadm_mw_mw_booster" in the equipment
library. I would prefer to also change the names of the existing
"openroadm" type_def and "standard"/"low_noise" type_variety,
representing an OpenROADM inline-amplifier, for better consistency but
this probably needs to be discussed first.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Mårtensson <jonas.martensson@ri.se>
Change-Id: I7344ff53623f166649efb389c95c04ff92718e35
Signed-off-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@telecominfraproject.com>
Co-authored-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@telecominfraproject.com>
