mirror of
https://github.com/Telecominfraproject/OpenCellular.git
synced 2026-01-09 00:51:29 +00:00
529548208c
Created a host command to set/get various motion sensor parameters and added an ectool command to use that host command. The host command is created such that the first argument is a sub-command. Sub-commands created include: dump: dumps all current motion sensor data info: returns general information about each motion sensor ec_rate: set/get the EC sampling rate of sensors sensor_range: set/get the sensor range (ie +/- 2G,4G,8G) sensor_odr: set/get the sensor output data rate (ie 50Hz, 100Hz, ...) For sensor_range and sensor_odr parameters, since the host doesn't know what are valid values for the parameter, the host can specify to round up or down to the nearest valid value. For example, the host can specify to set the output data rate to at least 100Hz, and the EC will return the closest valid output data rate that is at least 100Hz. BUG=chrome-os-partner:27321 BRANCH=rambi TEST=Test on a glimmer using ectool from vt-2 prompt: > ectool motionsense help Usage: motionsense - dump all motion data motionsense info NUM - print sensor info motionsense ec_rate [RATE_MS] - set/get sample rate motionsense odr NUM [ODR [ROUNDUP]] - set/get sensor ODR motionsense range NUM [RANGE [ROUNDUP]]- set/get sensor range > > ectool motionsense Sensor 0: 0, 0, 1024 Sensor 1: 1024, 0, 0 Sensor 2: None > ectool motionsense info 0 Type: accel Location: base Chip: kxcj9 > ectool motionsense ec_rate 10 > ectool motionsense ec_rate 1000 1000 > ectool motionsense odr 0 100000 > ectool motionsense odr 0 40000 1 50000 > ectool motionsense range 0 8 8 After running this I verified on the EC console that all the parameters were set appropriately. I tested the EC sampling rate was 1000ms by running lidangle on and making sure samples were displayed roughly every second. I verified the sensor odr and range by defining CONFIG_CMD_ACCELS and typing: > accelrange 0 8 > accelrate 0 50000 Change-Id: I444e2f0eafabd607f1c7aa78b5c4e91f6cb06387 Signed-off-by: Alec Berg <alecaberg@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/192064 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/193307 Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
In the most general case, the flash layout looks something like this: +---------------------+ | Reserved for EC use | +---------------------+ +---------------------+ | Vblock B | +---------------------+ | RW firmware B | +---------------------+ +---------------------+ | Vblock A | +---------------------+ | RW firmware A | +---------------------+ +---------------------+ | FMAP | +---------------------+ | Public root key | +---------------------+ | Read-only firmware | +---------------------+ BIOS firmware (and kernel) put the vblock info at the start of each image where it's easy to find. The Blizzard EC expects the firmware vector table to come first, so we have to put the vblock at the end. This means we have to know where to look for it, but that's built into the FMAP and the RO firmware anyway, so that's not an issue. The RO firmware doesn't need a vblock of course, but it does need some reserved space for vboot-related things. Using SHA256/RSA4096, the vblock is 2468 bytes (0x9a4), while the public root key is 1064 bytes (0x428) and the current FMAP is 644 bytes (0x284). If we reserve 4K at the top of each FW image, that should give us plenty of room for vboot-related stuff.