We wanted to provide an option for users to specify the domains on which
they can show the website. The rest of the sites shouldn't see the
widget at all.
It's not possible generally through Origin because you can't get Origin
when loading via an iframe. What I've done is add frame ancestors for
the domains specified in allowed domains. I hope this solves most of the
problems.
This is added in a way that it won't affect existing widgets. Only If
they have configured allowed domains, it will start blocking. Otherwise,
it would follow the previous behavior without any changes.
This change supports called wild card domains as well. You can add a
comma‑separated list of domains, either wild card or regular domains.
---
To test, deploy to staging. Call the following API to update the
allowed_domains list.
```
URL: PATCH /api/v1/accounts/<account-id>/inboxes/<inbox-id>
Payload:
{
"channel": { "allowed_domains": "*.chatwoot.dev,chatwoot.com" }
}
```
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/1985
Fixes [CW-5540](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5540/feat-allow-retry-a-failed-message-sendout),
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12333
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="196" height="113" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8b4a1aa9-c75c-4169-b4a2-e89148647e91"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes#12419
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes:
1. Ensuring dropdowns always stay within the screen, with auto
top/bottom/left/right positioning.
2. Fixing the dropdown truncation issue.
3. Removing the display of IDs from dropdowns.
4. Increasing the width of the inbox limit input field.
5. Updating the position of the **Update** button in the agent
assignment edit page.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/f20afc854edc42fab69a003f347d089b?sid=5e5f45f3-5950-46ff-b25c-0d1894daaede
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
This PR is part of https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12259. It
adds a default expiry of 180 days for tokens issued on the widget. The
expiry can be customized based on customer requests and internal
security requirements.
Co-authored-by: Balasaheb Dubale <bdubale@entrata.com>
We recently introduced the WhatsApp Embedded Signup flow in Chatwoot to
simplify onboarding. However, we discovered two important limitations:
Some customers’ numbers are already linked to an Embedded Signup, which
blocks re-use. Tech providers cannot onboard their own numbers via
Embedded Signup.
As a result, we need to support both Manual and Embedded Signup flows to
cover all scenarios.
### Problem
- Current UI only offers the Embedded Signup option.
- Customers who need to reuse existing numbers (already connected to
WABA) or tech providers testing their own numbers get stuck.
- Manual flow exists but is no longer exposed in the UX
**Current Embedded Signup screen**
<img width="2564" height="1250" alt="CleanShot 2025-08-21 at 21 58
07@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c3de4cf1-cae6-4a0e-aa9c-5fa4e2249c0e"
/>
**Current Manual Setup screen**
<img width="2568" height="1422" alt="CleanShot 2025-08-21 at 22 00
25@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/96408f97-3ffe-42d1-9019-a511e808f5ac"
/>
### Solution
- Design a dual-path UX in the Create WhatsApp Inbox step that:
- Offers Embedded Signup (default/recommended) for new numbers and
businesses.
- Offers Manual Setup for advanced users, existing linked numbers, and
tech providers.
<img width="2030" height="1376" alt="CleanShot 2025-09-01 at 14 13
16@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6f17e5a2-a2fd-40fb-826a-c9ee778be795"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
The frontend filtering didn't handle the `id` to `display_id` mapping of
conversations. This PR fixes it
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Deleting large Accounts/Inboxes with object.destroy! can time out and
create heavy destroy_async fan-out; this change adds a simple pre-purge
that batch-destroys heavy associations first .
```
Account: conversations, contacts
Inbox: conversations, contact_inboxes
```
We use find_in_batches(5000), then proceeds with destroy!, reducing DB
pressure and race conditions while preserving callbacks and leaving the
behavior for non heavy models unchanged. The change is also done in a
way to easily add additional objects or relations to the list.
fixes:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-3106/inbox-deletion-process-update-the-flow
The system determines a user’s active account by checking the
`active_at` field in the `account_users` table and selecting the most
recently active account:
```ruby
def active_account_user
account_users.order(active_at: :desc)&.first
end
```
This works fine when all accounts have a valid active_at timestamp.
**Problem**
When a user is added to a new account, the `active_at` value is NULL
(because the account has never been explicitly activated). Ordering by
active_at DESC produces inconsistent results across databases, since
handling of NULL values differs (sometimes treated as high, sometimes
low).
As a result:
- Mobile apps (critical impact): `/profile` returns the wrong account.
The UI keeps showing the old account even after switching, and
restarting does not fix it.
- Web app (accidentally works): Appears correct because the active
account is inferred from the browser URL, but the backend API is still
wrong.
**Root Cause**
- The ordering logic did not account for NULL `active_at`.
- New accounts without active_at sometimes get incorrectly prioritized
as the “active” account.
**Solution**
Explicitly ensure that accounts with NULL active_at are sorted after
accounts with real timestamps by using NULLS LAST:
```ruby
def active_account_user
account_users.order(Arel.sql('active_at DESC NULLS LAST, id DESC'))&.first
end
```
- Accounts with actual `active_at` values will always be prioritized.
- New accounts (with NULL active_at) will be placed at the bottom until
the user explicitly activates them.
- Adding id DESC as a secondary ordering ensures consistent tie-breaking
when multiple accounts have the same `active_at`.
While investigating a customer-reported issue, I found that some emails
were appearing late in Chatwoot. The root cause was query timeouts.
It only happened for emails with an in_reply_to header. In these cases,
Chatwoot first checks if a message exists with message_id = in_reply_to.
If not, it falls back to checking conversations where
additional_attributes->>'in_reply_to' = ?.
We were using:
```rb
@inbox.conversations.where("additional_attributes->>'in_reply_to' = ?", in_reply_to).first
```
This looked harmless, but .first caused timeouts. Without .first, the
query ran fine. The issue was the generated SQL:
```sql
SELECT *
FROM conversations
WHERE inbox_id = $1
AND (additional_attributes->>'in_reply_to' = '<in-reply-to-id>')
ORDER BY id ASC
LIMIT $2;
```
The ORDER BY id forced a full scan, even with <10k records.
The fix was to replace .first with .find_by:
```rb
@inbox.conversations.find_by("additional_attributes->>'in_reply_to' = ?", in_reply_to)
```
This generates:
```sql
SELECT *
FROM conversations
WHERE inbox_id = $1
AND (additional_attributes->>'in_reply_to' = '<in-reply-to-id>')
LIMIT $2;
```
This avoids the scan and runs quickly without needing an index.
By the way, Cursor and Claude failed
[here](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12401), it just kept on
adding the index without figuring out the root cause.
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This Pull Request will provide a language selector in the Profile
Settings for each user, and allows them to change the UI language per
agent, defaulting back to the account locale.
Fixes # #678 This does PR addresses the Dashboard view but does not
change the language of the agents emails
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [X ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Go to an Agents Profile settings page
2. Select a language from the Language drop down
3. the UI will update to the new i18n locale
4. navigate through the UI to make sure the appropriate language is
being used
5. Refresh the page to test that the locale persists
270
- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [X] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [X] My changes generate no new warnings
- [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [X] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [X] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Checklist:.724.2708
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Meta announced that Graph API v17.0 will reach end-of-life on September
12, 2025, requiring migration to v18.0 or higher. Updated the default
Facebook API version from v17.0 to v18.0 across configuration files in
response to Meta's deprecation notice.
This PR delivers the first slice of the voice channel: inbound call
handling. When a customer calls a configured voice
number, Chatwoot now creates a new conversation and shows a dedicated
call bubble in the UI. As the call progresses
(ringing, answered, completed), its status updates in real time in both
the conversation list and the call bubble, so
agents can instantly see what’s happening. This focuses on the inbound
flow and is part of breaking the larger voice
feature into smaller, functional, and testable units; further
enhancements will follow in subsequent PRs.
references: #11602 , #11481
## Testing
- Configure a Voice inbox in Chatwoot with your Twilio number.
- Place a call to that number.
- Verify a new conversation appears in the Voice inbox for the call.
- Open it and confirm a dedicated voice call message bubble is shown.
- Watch status update live (ringing/answered); hang up and see it change
to completed in both the bubble and conversation
list.
- to test missed call status, make sure to hangup the call before the
please wait while we connect you to an agent message plays
## Screens
<img width="400" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 3 11 25 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6a1d2ff-2ded-47b7-9144-a9d898beb380"
/>
<img width="700" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 3 11 33 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c25e6a1e-a885-47f7-b3d7-c3e15eef18c7"
/>
<img width="700" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 3 11 57 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29e7366d-b1d4-4add-a062-4646d2bff435"
/>
<img width="442" height="255" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-04 at 11 55 01 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/703126f6-a448-49d9-9c02-daf3092cc7f9"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Description
Fixes a UI bug in the search bar dropdown where long lists were not
scrollable after the latest update.
Adds a `max-height` to the `<ul>` element and enables vertical
scrolling.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Verified scrolling works for long search results.
- Confirmed layout remains correct on different screen sizes.
- No other UI elements affected.
## Checklist
- [x] Code follows project style guidelines
- [x] Self-reviewed code
- [x] Changes generate no new warnings
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds the `AssignmentCard` component with a story for the agent
management UI.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="1061" height="357" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e5548325-294a-48f8-8c7f-0a0c9272bf76"
/>
<img width="1061" height="357" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cfb76bf4-bddc-4ec4-a27d-27be3efb0e8f"
/>
<img width="1061" height="357" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6efc6617-4ce5-42df-b239-c296bbd0acc5"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
There was a fundamental difference in how resolution counts were
calculated between the agent summary and timeseries reports, causing
confusion for users when the numbers didn't match.
The agent summary report counted all `conversation_resolved` events
within a time period by querying the `reporting_events` table directly.
However, the timeseries report had an additional constraint that
required the conversation to currently be in resolved status
(`conversations.status = 1`). This meant that if an agent resolved a
conversation that was later reopened, the resolution action would be
counted in the summary but not in the timeseries.
This fix aligns both reports to count resolution events rather than
conversations in resolved state. When an agent resolves a conversation,
they should receive credit for that action regardless of what happens to
the conversation afterward. The same logic now applies to bot
resolutions as well.
The change removes the `conversations: { status: :resolved }` condition
from both `scope_for_resolutions_count` and
`scope_for_bot_resolutions_count` methods in CountReportBuilder, and
updates the corresponding test expectations to reflect that all
resolution events are counted.
## About timezone
When a timezone is specified via `timezone_offset` parameter, the
reporting system:
1. Converts timestamps to the target timezone before grouping
2. Groups data by local day/week/month boundaries in that timezone, but
the primary boundaries are sent by the frontend and used as-is
3. Returns timestamps representing midnight in the target timezone
This means the same events can appear in different day buckets depending
on the timezone used. For summary reports, it works fine, since the user
only needs the total count between two timestamps and the frontend sends
the timestamps adjusted for timezone.
## Testing Locally
Run the following command, this will erase all data for that account and
put in 1000 conversations over last 3 months, parameters of this can be
tweaked in `Seeders::Reports::ReportDataSeeder`
I'd suggest updating the values to generate data over 30 days, with
10000 conversations, it will take it's sweet time to run but then the
data will be really rich, great for testing.
```
ACCOUNT_ID=2 ENABLE_ACCOUNT_SEEDING=true bundle exec rake db:seed:reports_data
```
Pro Tip: Don't run the app when the seeder is active, we manually create
the reporting events anyway. So once done just use `redis-cli FLUSHALL`
to clear all sidekiq jobs. Will be easier on the system
Use the following scripts to test it
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/1263a922f5efd24df8e448a816a06257
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/ca0b861fa0139e2cccdb72526ea844b2
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/5fe73d1f48f35422fd1fd142ea3498f3
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/3b7b1f9e2ff149007170e5c329432f45
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/f245fa2f44cd973e5d60aac64f979162
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshots
**Before**
<img width="1129" height="862" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4752a3d9-bbe1-497f-9488-572c65768f7c"
/>
**After**
<img width="1129" height="862" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ec8d5194-f279-4d23-b6df-9e99fce74e69"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Linked PR
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12113
## Linear Link
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4515/upload-pdfs-to-captain
## Description
This PR adds support for PDF file uploads to the Captain document
knowledge base system. The feature enables users to upload PDF files
directly to the knowledge base for FAQ generation and document
processing, expanding beyond the existing URL-based document ingestion.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Unit Tests
- Manually via UI
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR add the ability to filter contact based on labels.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4001/feat-ability-to-filter-contact-based-on-labels
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/f3d58d0fcee844b7817325a9a19929d3?sid=075b9448-7e6d-4180-af3c-9466fbf2138b
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes custom conversation attributes copying as `[object
Object]` by enhancing the clipboard helper to properly serialize objects
and handle different data types.
Fixes
[CW-5428](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5428/copying-custom-conversation-attribute-returns-object-object-instead-of),
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12202
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/f52db17d4d524b3cbb5badb2b6f381eb?sid=2b34f38f-e95d-4981-be5f-6cb42a0212b9
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Currently, auto-assignment runs only during conversation creation or
update events. If no agents are online when new conversations arrive,
those conversations remain unassigned.
With this change, unassigned conversations will be automatically
assigned once agents become available. The job runs every 15 minutes and
uses a fair distribution threshold of 100 to prevent a large number of
conversations from being assigned to a single available agent. This will
be customizable later.
We were using UTM params on various branding urls which weren't
compliant to standard utm params and hence were ignored by analytics
tooling. this PR ensures that the params stays compliant with defined
standard
ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTM_parameters
## Changes
- updated utm tags on widget and survey urls
- added utm on helpcenter branding
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
