# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR increases the custom filter limit from 50 to 1000 per user
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="1264" height="71" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e12667bb-147c-4115-b8a8-9113fca471db"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5692/whatsapp-es-numbers-stuck-in-pending-due-to-premature-registration
### Problem
Multiple customers reported that their WhatsApp numbers remain stuck in
**Pending** in WhatsApp Manager even after successful onboarding.
- Our system triggers a **registration call**
(`/<PHONE_NUMBER_ID>/register`) as soon as the number is OTP verified.
- In many cases, Meta hasn’t finished **display name
review/provisioning**, so the call fails with:
```
code: 100, error_subcode: 2388001
error_user_title: "Cannot Create Certificate"
error_user_msg: "Your display name could not be processed. Please edit
your display name and try again."
```
- This leaves the number stuck in Pending, no messaging can start until
we manually retry registration.
- Some customers have reported being stuck in this state for **7+
days**.
### Root cause
- We only check `code_verification_status = VERIFIED` before attempting
registration.
- We **don’t wait** for display name provisioning (`name_status` /
`platform_type`) to be complete.
- As a result, registration fails prematurely and the number never
transitions out of Pending.
### Solution
#### 1. Health Status Monitoring
- Build a backend service to fetch **real-time health data** from Graph
API:
- `code_verification_status`
- `name_status` / `display_name_status`
- `platform_type`
- `throughput.level`
- `messaging_limit_tier`
- `quality_rating`
- Expose health data via API
(`/api/v1/accounts/:account_id/inboxes/:id/health`).
- Display this in the UI as an **Account Health tab** with clear badges
and direct links to WhatsApp Manager.
#### 2. Smarter Registration Logic
- Update `WebhookSetupService` to include a **dual-condition check**:
- Register if:
1. Phone is **not verified**, OR
2. Phone is **verified but provisioning incomplete** (`platform_type =
NOT_APPLICABLE`, `throughput.level = NOT_APPLICABLE`).
- Skip registration if number is already provisioned.
- Retry registration automatically when stuck.
- Provide a UI banner with complete registration button so customers can
retry without manual support.
### Screenshot
<img width="2292" height="1344" alt="CleanShot 2025-09-30 at 16 01
03@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1c417d2a-b11c-475e-b092-3c5671ee59a7"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
### Problem
The Slack integration fails when fetching channels from workspaces with
many channels due to rate limiting errors. The current implementation
makes a single API call requesting both public and private channels
simultaneously with `types: 'public_channel,private_channel'`, which
causes Slack's API to apply complex filtering and hit rate limits more
frequently.
When testing with a csutomer workspace containing 157 channels:
- Combined request: Hit rate limits after a few pages, required 22+ API
calls with long delays
- Separate requests: Private channels (1 channel) load instantly, public
channels (185 channels) load quickly
### Solution
Split the channel fetching into two sequential steps:
1. **Fetch private channels first** with `limit: 1000` (expects very
few)
2. **Fetch public channels second** with pagination as needed
This approach leverages the fact that Slack's API handles single-type
requests much more efficiently than mixed-type requests, avoiding the
rate limiting issues entirely while maintaining the same functionality.
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/10914
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [x ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds a password visibility toggle to the auth form input
component.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screencast
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/17652e86-e823-46e6-a3ba-80af37c78906
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
The test was failing because Current.contact was not being cleared when
testing system auto-resolution. Added Current.contact = nil to ensure
the system auto-resolution message is triggered instead of contact
resolution.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/11753 and
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12442
**Problem**
When a WhatsApp conversation started with a media message, the
conversation created webhook would sometimes fire before the message and
its relationships were fully committed to the database. This resulted in
the message being missing
from the webhook payload, breaking external automations that rely on
this field.
**Solution**
Added `ActiveRecord::Base.transaction` wrapper around the core message
processing operations in `Whatsapp::IncomingMessageBaseService` to
ensure atomic execution:
- `set_conversation` (creates conversation)
- `create_messages` (creates message with account_id)
- `clear_message_source_id_from_redis` (cleanup)
Now the webhook only triggers after all related data is fully persisted,
guaranteeing message availability.
This PR refactors existing Brazil phone number normalization logic into
a generic, extensible service while maintaining backward compatibility.
Also extracts it into a dedicated service designed for expansion to
support additional countries.
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
With this change, the indexing would be separate from the search, so you
need to enable indexing on the cloud and run it. It should start
indexing the messages to ElasticSearch/OpenSearch. Once indexing is
completed, we can turn on the feature for the customer.
Make sure that the following is done when you deploy.
Set POSTGRES_STATEMENT_TIMEOUT=600s before you run the indexing.
1. Make sure that the account with advanced_search has
advanced_search_indexing enabled
```rb
Account.feature_advanced_search.each do |account|
account.enable_features(:advanced_search_indexing)
account.save!
end
```
2. Enable indexing for all accounts with paid subscription.
```rb
Account.where("custom_attributes ->> 'plan_name' IN (?)", ['Enterprise', 'Startups', 'Business']).each do |account|
account.enable_features(:advanced_search_indexing)
account.save!
end
```
3. Run indexing for all the messages.
```rb
Message.reindex
```
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# load reply to message
## Description
When replayed message is more old, not show content
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [X] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
I run in my development and production envinronment with unoapi
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR updates Guyana's country dial code from +595 to +592
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12501 ,
[CW-5669](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5669/incorrect-country-code)
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
This PR implements the **"Lock to Single Conversation"** option for
Telegram inboxes, bringing it to parity with WhatsApp, SMS, and other
channels.
- When **enabled**: resolved conversations can be reopened (single
thread).
- When **disabled**: new messages from a resolved conversation create a
**new conversation**.
- Added **agent name display** in outgoing Telegram messages (formatted
as `Agent Name: message`).
- Updated frontend to display agent name above messages in the dashboard
(consistent with WhatsApp behavior).
This fixes [#8046](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8046).
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Unit tests added in
`spec/services/telegram/incoming_message_service_spec.rb`
- Scenarios covered:
- Lock enabled → reopens resolved conversation
- Lock disabled → creates new conversation if resolved
- Lock disabled → appends to last open conversation
- Manual tests:
1. Create a Telegram conversation
2. Mark it as resolved
3. Send a new message from same user
4. ✅ Expected: new conversation created (if lock disabled)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Additional Documentation
For full technical details of this implementation, please refer to:
[TELEGRAM_LOCK_TO_SINGLE_CONVERSATION_IMPLEMENTATION_EN.md](./TELEGRAM_LOCK_TO_SINGLE_CONVERSATION_IMPLEMENTATION_EN.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5646/add-support-for-grouped-file-uploads-in-slack
Previously, when sending multiple attachments to Slack, we uploaded them
one by one. For example, sending 5 images would result in 5 separate
Slack messages. This created clutter and a poor user experience, since
Slack displayed each file as an individual message.
This PR updates the implementation to group all attachments from a
message and send them as a single Slack message. As a result,
attachments now appear together in one grouped block, providing a much
cleaner and more intuitive experience for users.
**Before:**
Each file uploaded as a separate Slack message.
<img width="400" height="800" alt="before"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c8c7f666-549b-428f-bd19-c94e39ed2513"
/>
**After:**
All files from a single message grouped and displayed together in one
Slack message (similar to how Slack natively handles grouped uploads).
<img width="400" height="800" alt="after"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0b1f22d5-4d37-4b84-905a-15e742317e72"
/>
**Changes**
- Upgraded Slack file upload implementation to use the new multiple
attachments API available in slack-ruby-client `v2.7.0`.
- Updated attachment handling to upload all files from a message in a
single API call.
- Enabled proper attachment grouping in Slack, ensuring related files
are presented together.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes an issue where users are unable to delete an inbox because
the delete confirmation button remains disabled.
### Cause
Inboxes created with leading or trailing spaces in their names failed
the confirmation check. During deletion, the confirmation modal compared
the raw user input with the stored inbox name. Because whitespace was
not normalized, the values did not match exactly, causing the delete
button to remain inactive even when the correct name was entered.
### Solution
The validation logic now trims whitespace from both the input and stored
value before comparison. This ensures inbox names with accidental spaces
are handled correctly, and the delete button works as expected in all
cases.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5659/confirmation-button-greyed-out-randomly-when-deleting-inbox-from-inbox
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Steps to Reproduce**
1. Create an inbox with leading or trailing whitespace in its name.
2. Save and complete the inbox creation process.
3. Go to the inbox list and try deleting the inbox by entering the name
without the whitespace in the confirmation modal.
4. Now you can't able to delete the inbox.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
- If super admin updates a user email from super admin panel , it will
be confirmed automatically if confirmed at is present
- Also unconfirmed emails will be visible for super admins on dashboard
fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8958
This PR is the fix for MFA changes, to not generate auth tokens without
MFA verification in case MFA is enabled for the account
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Linear Link:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5636/pdf-faqs-captain-generates-faqs-in-the-english-only
## Description
PDF Faqs should be generated in the same language as set in account
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
This has been tested via UI, by setting account language to arabic and
upload the pdf for faq generation (pdf content in Hindi)
<img width="1045" height="1085" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/10385181-578e-4933-afc4-4609a6abcec8"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Description
This pull request introduces an optional parameter, `phone_number_id`,
to the WhatsApp API call responsible for retrieving media. The addition
of this parameter allows for greater flexibility when interacting with
the WhatsApp API, as it can now accommodate scenarios where specifying a
particular phone number ID is necessary. This change is backward
compatible and does not affect existing functionality if the parameter
is not provided.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
The changes were tested locally by invoking the WhatsApp media retrieval
API with and without the `phone_number_id` parameter. Both scenarios
were verified to ensure that:
- When `phone_number_id` is provided, the API call includes the
parameter and functions as expected.
- When `phone_number_id` is omitted, the API call continues to work as
before, maintaining backward compatibility.
No errors or warnings were observed during testing, and all relevant
unit tests passed successfully.
## Checklist
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
when filtering contacts by phone number a + is always added to the
begining of the query, this means that the filtering breaks if the
complete phone number with international code and + is entered
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Updated automated tests
Tested manually with contact filtering UI
## Checklist:
- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [X] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [X] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [X] My changes generate no new warnings
- [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [X] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [X] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Ensure messages go to correct conversation when receive multi user in 1
LINE webhook.
base on
[document](https://developers.line.biz/en/reference/messaging-api/#webhook-event-objects:~:text=There%20is%20not%20necessarily%20one%20user%20per%20webhook).
it said
```
There is not necessarily one user per webhook.
A message event from person A and a follow event from person B may be in the same webhook.
```
this PR has 1 break changes.
In old version. when receive
[follow](https://developers.line.biz/en/reference/messaging-api/#follow-event)
event, it will create conversation with no messages.
After this PR. when receive follow event, it will not create
conversation, contact and messages
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
add test case.
and follow event test by delete conversation, and block and unblock line
account
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: mix5003 <mix5003@debian.debian>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes the incorrect contact access in conversations listing API.
Cause:
- `undefined method 'conversations' for nil` error because `@contact` is
not initialized
Solution:
- Using `@contact_inbox` to access `@contact`
- `@contact_inbox` is properly set in the parent controller's
`set_contact_inbox` method
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4185/incorrect-contact-access-pattern-in
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This pull request allow LINE to receive files.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
add testcase. and test manually by myself.
in case you want to test in android, use native share method to share
files to LINE.
you can share more file types to LINE (native line share only send
image,video and audio).
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: mix5003 <mix5003@debian.debian>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
