This PR fixes `docker compose up` but it doesn't have the test client ->
resource flow working but it prevent anything from erroring at startup.
This fixes:
* tokens (use the correct token for the client user agent we are using)
* randomize `name_suffix` at start up for connlib (we will eventually
allow options to set it manually)
* remove port ranges for relay (see firezone/product#613)
This makes it possible to build the Apple/Android FFI bridges and
integrate them with their respective client apps.
---------
Signed-off-by: Francesca Lovebloom <franlovebloom@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Roopesh Chander <roop@roopc.net>
**Update CONTRIBUTING.md**
Why:
* The CONTRIBUTING.md doc seems to have fallen slightly out of date with
how Firezone now works. This commit updates the doc to provide a
quick start guide for getting all of the various Firezone components
up and running as quick as possible. The doc then links to the more
specific `Elixir` and `Rust` README.md files in the respective
directories to help developers who would like to contribute.
**Update docker-compose vault health check**
Why:
* The current Vault health check listed in the docker-compose file does
not seem to be working when using `localhost` in the `wget` command.
Updating the URL to use `127.0.0.1` seems to have fixed it.
---------
Signed-off-by: bmanifold <bmanifold@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jamil <jamilbk@users.noreply.github.com>
Did some research on status page providers to manage incidents.
statuspage.io seems to be easy to use and cost-effective, fairly popular
and provides a good amount of flexibility to customize emails,
notifications, etc.
Super easy to set up and use but am not married to it if anyone feels
strongly about using another incident management service.
https://firezone.statuspage.io
## Demo:
<img width="235" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 8 07 29 AM"
src="https://github.com/firezone/firezone/assets/167144/8ad12b9b-7345-4a5d-bf43-c8af798d85f9">
@AndrewDryga ~~Was still hitting some redirect issues so I'll wait for
those to be resolved before continuing on building more views.~~ Edit:
After some sleep and coffee, I figured it out. Nice work on the sign in
form!
I went ahead and scoped existing dashboard links with `@account` and
fixed a dark mode issue -- you may want to cherry-pick those commits.
I'll add these to authenticated routes and integrate into what you have
so far.
As I was going through last night exploring your route approach I
thought of some edge cases; can discuss next week. I think the main one
that came to mind was that we probably want to differentiate between
login flows initiated directly in the browser (this is an admin logging
into the dashboard) vs login flows initiated from a client app (these
will terminate with a final redirect to respective `dest` whitelisted
URL). Maybe it makes sense to segregate these flows?
If a regular user tries login directly from the browser maybe we want to
show them something like "Please login from your Firezone application
instead" as they should only be able to initiate logins from a client
application. Or maybe there's simply no possibility to end up at the
final Android App Link or `firezone://` URI with a login initiated
directly from the browser?
There are problems building the docker images in macos using musl due to
ring's problems therefore we started using slim-debian with glibc for
development.
When using `docker compose build` or any other way of building docker
images in parallel the way the cache was working with the rust's
Dockerfile made the caches between images overlap and corrupt each
other. We add a `locked` which prevents multiple writers to the same
cache to fix this behaviour.
This brindgs connlib from its own separated repo to firezone's monorepo.
On top of bringing connlib we also add and unify the Dockerfile for all
rust binaries and add a docker-compose that can run a headless client, a
relay and a gateway which eventually will test the whole flow between a
client and a resource. For this to work we also incorporated some elixir
scripts to generate portal tokens for those components.
Did some research when picking a package manager for the website and
settled on `pnpm` for the following reasons:
- CLI-compatible with `npm`
- Typically faster than even `yarn` especially on Apple silicon
- Security: Pnpm uses a different dependency resolution algorithm and
different folder structure of node_modules that prevents illegal access
to packages by other packages.
I think I caught all the places, but I may be missing something, so if
this isn't a good idea we can revert back.
This PR also cleans up the actions workflows to remove dead code.
* Remove `www/`
* Stub empty `website/` to silence Vercel. This shouldn't cause
conflicts when we merge `cloud` to `master`. Perhaps we want to start
working off `master` soon, and move the current tip of master to
`legacy`?
With this PR, the relay can be configured with a WebSocket URL on startup. If given, it will attempt to connect to it and join the `relay` room with its `stamp_secret`. Once the `init` message is received, regular relay operation will begin.
Targets specified in the `rust-toolchain.toml` file are automatically installed by `rustup`. This avoid setup steps for other devs and also simplifies the CI setup.
To be able to compile native code to musl, we do need `musl-gcc` which comes with the `musl-tools` package on ubuntu.
Previously, the relay would treat the `stamp_secret` internally as bytes and share it with the outside world as hex-string. The portal however treats it as an opaque string and uses the UTF-8 bytes to create username and password.
This patch aligns the relay's functionality with the portal and stores the `stamp_secret` internally as a string.
This saves us several lines of code and allows usage of the relay via
commandline arguments in addition to env variables. Note that because of
`#[arg(env)]`, all of these can still be configured via environment
variables too.
To complete the authentication scheme for the relay, we need to prompt
the client with a nonce when they send an unauthenticated request. The
semantic meaning of a nonce is opaque to the client. As a starting
point, we implement a count-based scheme. Each nonce is valid for 10
requests. After that, a request will be rejected with a 401 and the
client has to authenticate with a new nonce.
This scheme provides a basic form of replay-protection.
